01-13-2020 10:55 PM
Hi All,
Is it entering command "switchport block unicast" on interface level/basis would impact (VOIP traffic) phones connected to that interface.
As im getting an few complaint that users are unable to hear voice while calling to other users.
Any help will be appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-14-2020 10:32 AM
Hello VishalShah7719,
How Marce mentioned you can put storm control in switch ports.
This example shows how to enable unicast storm control on a port with an 87-percent rising suppression level and a 65-percent falling suppression level:
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# interface gigabitethernet1/0/1
Switch(config-if)# storm-control unicast level 87 65
Other examples in link bellow:
Also, you can increase mac-aging time, if necessary and use port security mac sticky to fix two or more MAC in the port. Careful the last command, this needs attention when you change/move host or phone another port.
Please rate and mark posts accordingly if you have found any of the information provided useful.
It will hopefully assist others with similar issues in the future.
Best regards,
Lucas Freitas
01-13-2020 11:06 PM
- Why do you want to use that particular command and or what are the needs for that command ?
M.
01-14-2020 12:48 AM
Hi Marce,
Thanks for your reply.
Basically my aim is to enable flood blocking on the switch of unknown unicast or multicast traffic is flooded to a switch port because a MAC address has timed out or has not been learned by the switch.
01-14-2020 06:23 AM
- Simply blocking unicast traffic will be too heavy a measure because VoIP is unicast-traffic too. You may want to look into storm-control settings to protect against flooding. Google for instance on cisco ios storm control configuration examples , which will return a multitude of informational links concerning the subject.
M.
01-14-2020 10:32 AM
Hello VishalShah7719,
How Marce mentioned you can put storm control in switch ports.
This example shows how to enable unicast storm control on a port with an 87-percent rising suppression level and a 65-percent falling suppression level:
Switch# configure terminal
Switch(config)# interface gigabitethernet1/0/1
Switch(config-if)# storm-control unicast level 87 65
Other examples in link bellow:
Also, you can increase mac-aging time, if necessary and use port security mac sticky to fix two or more MAC in the port. Careful the last command, this needs attention when you change/move host or phone another port.
Please rate and mark posts accordingly if you have found any of the information provided useful.
It will hopefully assist others with similar issues in the future.
Best regards,
Lucas Freitas
01-15-2020 07:17 PM - edited 01-15-2020 07:50 PM
thanks buddy for your suggestion.
Also would it (switch port block unicast) impact data ports means laptop or computer connected ?
Reason I'm asking cause there's an audit happened at my company and they have suggested to enable such command on access ports.
01-16-2020 02:55 AM
Hello VishalShah7719,
When you use switchport block, you need MAC static or leaning by port security sticky, because if you don't have MAC in table, switch block traffic all unknown mac address.
https://www.cisco.com/c/m/en_us/techdoc/dc/reference/cli/nxos/commands/l2/switchport-block.html
Please rate and mark posts accordingly if you have found any of the information provided useful.
It will hopefully assist others with similar issues in the future.
Best regards,
Lucas Freitas
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide