11-12-2016 05:18 AM - edited 03-08-2019 08:08 AM
Hi all,
I have a question. In my production network I saw in a layer-3 switch there is configured a default route pointing towards next-hop ip (virtual IP of firewall inside) and the next-hop ip block is configured in a VLAN in the layer-3 switch. When I do trace I do not see the firewall ip address in the trace. Here you can tell that might be firewall is denying trace. But my observation is, if firewall is denying trace then I could see some timeout result for a hop in the trace path. But I did not see any timeout in the trace path rather I saw another IP address which is not the next-hop ip that we configured, it is the IP of a NIPS which is connected to outside interface of the firewall. Can anyone help to understand what is happening here ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-12-2016 09:06 AM
Which firewall are you using? If it's a Cisco ASA, it would be normal behavior as the ASA doesn't decrement the TTL by default. If you wan't to see the ASA in a traceroute, it can be enable with MPF.
11-12-2016 09:06 AM
Which firewall are you using? If it's a Cisco ASA, it would be normal behavior as the ASA doesn't decrement the TTL by default. If you wan't to see the ASA in a traceroute, it can be enable with MPF.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide