cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
340
Views
5
Helpful
2
Replies

Unrestricted Bandwidth for Specific VLAN Traffic

Henry Martel
Level 1
Level 1

All,

We have a site that's having network bandwidth utilization problems. During heavy utilization periods vital monitoring systems are slowed down and disconnect from their sensors and because of the layout of the site, the monitors are connected via wireless.

I suggested shaping/policing, but the site does not want to have bandwidth restrictions due to remote connections, their monitoring systems and various other reasons. It was suggested that I create a policy that would allow for a specific VLAN to have unrestricted access to bandwidth and restrict everything else.

Any suggestion?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

If you control both sides of the link, use QoS to support other than single global interface FIFO.  If you have routers that support fair-queue, I would suggest you try that.  If you have switches, you could split traffic into different classes, each with a minimum bandwidth guarantee.

Basically, instead of restricting bandwidth, guarantee bandwidth to the apps that need it.  The advantage of this, you get to use bandwidth otherwise made unavailable by a shaper or policer.

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

Joseph W. Doherty
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Disclaimer

The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.

Liability Disclaimer

In no event shall Author be liable for any damages wha2tsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.

Posting

If you control both sides of the link, use QoS to support other than single global interface FIFO.  If you have routers that support fair-queue, I would suggest you try that.  If you have switches, you could split traffic into different classes, each with a minimum bandwidth guarantee.

Basically, instead of restricting bandwidth, guarantee bandwidth to the apps that need it.  The advantage of this, you get to use bandwidth otherwise made unavailable by a shaper or policer.

Joseph - Thanks for the reply.

What you suggesting makes sense. Guaranted bandwidth for applications is proabably better way go on this.

Thanks

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card