12-08-2017 03:01 AM - edited 03-08-2019 01:02 PM
Can two Cisco L2 switches (one managed by us - other one managed by client) use different L2 vlans numbers in between the access link to connect and pass traffic?
12-08-2017 04:49 AM
Hi @sandy1
If I understood correctly, no. When the frame from your side cross the trunk between switches and get in the other side, the switch will try to put that frame on the vlan tagged, but, that vlan does not exist on that switch.
You can easily simulate this by using Packet Tracer. Find attached a lab for that, just rename it for .pkt
-If I helped you somehow, please, rate it as useful.-
12-08-2017 07:30 AM
Yes, so might be need to make the switch to switch connectivity an access port, so the connection will go untagged.
12-08-2017 07:35 AM
If you have vlan on both sides then there will be tag. The only way to send untagged is using native vlan on both side.
I didn't try that but you can try put both vlans as native and see what happen.
-If I helped you somehow, please, rate it as useful.-
12-08-2017 08:05 AM
i tried in lab. it works. I mean mark the switch to switch port as "access" port and as a member of a vlan,
switch 1 : access vlan 10
switch 2: access vlan 20
12-15-2017 09:55 AM
01-23-2018 10:58 PM
Hi @sandy1
in some cases it is possible that user and your vlan can pass traffic with each. by default Vlan behaviour does not allow to communicate with each other but you can allow specific vlan to communicate each other by using Trunk link
when you will make the link trunk those vlan which you want to communicate with each other can be allowed by
#switchport mode trunk
#Switchport trunk allowed vlan x,x,x,x
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide