01-11-2022 03:04 PM
Hello everyone ,
My question is a bit different about VPC loop prevention. We all know that , traffic from remote vpc member is can pass towards to vpc peer via peer-link but it is not allowed to exit from vpc member ports because of loop prevention.
But if BUM traffic comes from orphan port to local vpc , what will be VPC peer's behavior ? Because normally , traffic from remote orphan is allowed to pass through peer link and can exit via local vpc member. If it happens , it means vpc member ports would receive duplicate frames.
So do you have any idea about it ? Or am I wrong about "traffic from remote orphan is allowed to pass through peer link and can exit via local vpc member" part ?
Thank you
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-12-2022 01:36 AM
Not sure what is the concern here, i do not see any issue here as per your diagram, this is normal and deployment
most use case explained in better way here :
https://netcraftsmen.com/how-vpc-works/
01-12-2022 01:43 AM
Yes I know what are you talking about, if BUM forward via local vpc member and forward via other peer vpc member “pass through vpc link” then server have two copy and this is loop.
so in order to prevent that and to emulate two nexus to word as one virtual sw the vpc will never forward traffic receive from vpc link except the case peer vpc member is down.
01-12-2022 12:04 AM
Yes from orphan to other orphan connect to other VPC peer the traffic can pass.
01-12-2022 12:49 AM
Hi,
Actually my question is not about orphan to orphan communication. I wonder behavior of local orphan to remote vpc member communication? (assume traffic is broadcast) Because normally , traffic from remote orphan is allowed to pass through peer link and can exit via local vpc member.So if it happens , it means vpc attached server may get duplicate frames.
I can't find document about this scenario. But I think vpc peer switch can't let frame to exit via local vpc port when it comes from remote orphan port.
Since I can't find any document about this scenario , I need to be clarified.
01-12-2022 01:11 AM
friend,
from orphan connect to Peer-A of VPC the broadcast will forward to Server connect to Peer-A of VPC through the direct connect link, it not necessary to go through VPC-link and then to Peer-B of VPC and end to server.
if direct Link between Server and Peer-A down then traffic can pass through VPC-link ->Peer-B->Server
because Peer-B know that member link is down through control plane between the two Peer.
https://netcraftsmen.com/how-vpc-works/
01-12-2022 01:26 AM
I think you are talking about unicast traffic. My question is about broadcasts traffics.
I guess " Frames received in the vPC Peer Link cannot flood out a vCP Member Port while the remote vPC Peer has active vPC members in the same vPC "
http://www.cciemcgee.com/blog/nx-osvpcs
So I think I've misinformation that I mentioned in my first question ("traffic from remote orphan is allowed to pass through peer link and can exit via local vpc member"). I don't want to misinform people who read this topics. So you can ignore my "traffic from remote orphan is allowed to pass through peer link and can exit via local vpc member" sentence . It seems it is wrong.
01-12-2022 01:43 AM
Yes I know what are you talking about, if BUM forward via local vpc member and forward via other peer vpc member “pass through vpc link” then server have two copy and this is loop.
so in order to prevent that and to emulate two nexus to word as one virtual sw the vpc will never forward traffic receive from vpc link except the case peer vpc member is down.
01-12-2022 01:36 AM
Not sure what is the concern here, i do not see any issue here as per your diagram, this is normal and deployment
most use case explained in better way here :
https://netcraftsmen.com/how-vpc-works/
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide