06-27-2014 03:22 AM - edited 03-07-2019 07:51 PM
Hi guys,
I'm having problems implementing a vrf on a 3560G (12.2(55)SE9, C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M). I have a number of SVI's configured on the switch and I want to separate routing from one (to start) vlan from the rest.
I think my config looks ok, but when testing the traffic seems to die on the vlan interface. My config looks like this:
ip vrf red
rd 1:1
!
interface Vlan11
description Block 1 Guest WLAN
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 172.16.5.2 255.255.255.0
!
ip route vrf red 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet2/0/1 10.201.29.1
ip route vrf red 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.255 GigabitEthernet2/0/1 10.201.29.1
The 10.201.29.1 is an ASA firewall.
What am I missing!?!
Thanks.
edit: It just occurred to me that the exit interface (when traffic returning) won't know about the interface that's not in the global rib and I would need to route back from the global rib to the vrf?
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-27-2014 04:02 AM
If you add the route back into the global routing table it will solve the return route issue.
06-27-2014 04:02 AM
If you add the route back into the global routing table it will solve the return route issue.
06-27-2014 07:10 AM
Hello
Just like to add you don't need both those statics pointing your FW , Just the default route would do
res
Paul
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide