cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
4174
Views
10
Helpful
3
Replies

MCU v.s. CMS Advantage and Disadvantage

c1szhibin
Level 1
Level 1

As we known, MCU is already End-of-Sale. We're trying to sale CMS to our customers. As what the customers requested mostly, CMS doesn't support customized layout like MCU does, but CMS support more participants than MCU.

Anyone can point out all the advantage and disadvantage for comparing MCU and CMS?

3 Replies 3

Patrick McCarthy
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Really the only advantage a legacy MCU has over CMS is what you mentioned - more layout options. In reality very few of those dozens of layouts were ever used, most people stuck to some variation of speaker large and everyone else small - the 3x3, 4x4, etc layouts were not often used. 

CMS is far less expensive, far more scalable, also more flexible with resolutions and capacity (older MCU's you had to decide what resolution you wanted to support and that gave a hard capacity limit). Also distributed CMS can provide redundancy, and there is also the native compatibility with Lync/Skype, web client capability, chat, etc. 

Really no comparison. 

Wayne DeNardi
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

As you are aware, the MCUs have been on the way out for a while - originally being replaced by TelePresence Server (TPS), and now Cisco Meeting Server (CMS).  There's a list of differences between MCU and TPS and some of this is similar with CMS, apart from CMS can now do the web conferencing that TPS couldn't which narrows the gap of "missing" features even further, but does include many additonal benefits such as the interop with multiple other brands, the redunduncy and scalability mentioned by patrmcca, there is also better branding support (where you can customise the screens for your company) and CMS can also provide recording capabilities with the CMS-RECORDING option.

In a new install, unless you specifically need an Auto Attendant, or one of the specific MCU only layouts (which may also become less important over time as the endpoints become more capable with multi-streaming), then the answer should pretty well always be CMS.

Wayne
--
Please remember to rate responses and to mark your question as answered if appropriate.

Wayne

Please remember to mark helpful responses and to set your question as answered if appropriate.

dredd022474
Level 1
Level 1

Patrick is right.

There are specific layout that our customer wants that CMS and TP server cannot do, so we are recommending MCU 5300 which is available til May 2,2017.

But there are CMS can be integrated to Lync/Skype, WebRTC, has branding and recording.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/conferencing/telepresence-mcu-5300-series/eos-eol-notice-c51-738140.html

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/conferencing/telepresence-mcu-4500-series/eos-eol-notice-c51-733654.html