05-17-2007 07:51 AM - edited 03-17-2019 09:02 PM
I am have issues trying to get QOS working correctly over a Serial Int for a customer of ours. We are doing MGCP over a T1 to an Adtran IAD which is the customer VOIP gateway.
When I do a sho policy-map int f0/0, which is the interface to my core, I keep getting pkts matched 0/0.
Setup is like this:
Adtran 608
|
|
|
7206-VXR CT3 Serial Int
|
|
|
Cat6509 (running hybrid mode)
|
|
|
OSR-7609
|
|
|
Lucent Class 5
Right now, I am just trying to figure out the issue between my VOIP gateway and the 7206, then I will work my way back. Of course, any advice from the 7206 to my phone switch would help as well.
Attached is what I have provisioned on my 7206 and my Adtran. I appreciate the help.
05-17-2007 08:15 AM
Hi,
Since you have not specified a "match-any" statement, the class-map wants to match all the conditions. This is evidently not happening.
See the guidelines when configuring multiple match statements at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00808029ea.html
Note: Unless your FE0/0 is congested (check queue length), the service policy there is not going to do anything and you can remove it.
Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!
05-17-2007 09:20 AM
I apprecaite the help, but doesn't seem to change anything. My pkts matched still seem to show 0/0, like it isn't working. Now correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't this packet count be going up, if It were correctly matching packets that were being set dscp ef (46) or dscp af31 (26) in the header info? Maybe I am reading this wrong. Maybe my IAD device isn't marking them correctly...I don't know? Can you see anything else wrong with my Class-maps or policy-maps, by chance?
This is what was changed:
class-map match-all voip
match ip precedence 5
match ip rtp 16384 16383
match access-group 105
match ip dscp ef
match input-interface Serial1/1/28:0
match any
class-map match-all voice-signaling
match access-group 106
match ip dscp af31
match any
!
!
policy-map voippolicy
class voip
priority percent 50
class voice-signaling
priority percent 5
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect dscp-based
Also, you said I don't need this on my F0/0 interface...wouldn't I need this on that interface as well to give priority to voip traffic, considering it is my up link towards my call agent? I do have close to 2 DS3's worth of T1's on the router. Thanks for your help.
05-17-2007 09:36 AM
Hi,
The thing is that you still have "match-all voip", that should be changed to "match-any". I wouls also reduce the match conditions to the minimum necessary, because these are all additional checks done for each packet, and can affect performance negatively.
I don't think that the Fe0/0 will need service policy, because 100 is more that 90 MBps (theoretical), but if you observe queue to build up on fa0/0, you can retain it. Remember, no congestion, no need for QoS or priority.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide