01-19-2015 05:39 PM - edited 03-18-2019 03:55 AM
Hi Cisco,
We want to deploy Clustering of 3 Conductor servers (2 local) and 1 over the WAN in a different DC.
Based on clustering guide 2.x and 3.x it states we need 30 ms RTT between Conductor servers, currently we have 50 ms RTT. Does Conductor 3.0 supports higher RTT? What are the implications of deploying Conductor with higher RTT?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-19-2015 06:20 PM
The round-trip time is still the same, 30ms, and hasn't changed.
As far as any issues you might come across if you go over the round-trip time, take a look at this discussion conductor-clustering-and-latency.
01-19-2015 06:20 PM
The round-trip time is still the same, 30ms, and hasn't changed.
As far as any issues you might come across if you go over the round-trip time, take a look at this discussion conductor-clustering-and-latency.
01-20-2015 08:54 AM
Thanks Patrick,
I'm surprised this RTT is too low since Conductor just handle mostly signaling. Probably some under the hood DB requirement. I'm thinking of having 2 separate clusters, each in a different Data Center monitoring the same TPS. (Active/Standby), but CUCM will be configured to only select the "standby cluster" when the "closest" Conductor cluster is unreachable.
Do you know if TPS 4.X in remote manage mode supports this scenario?
Thanks
01-20-2015 09:27 AM
I've never heard of anyone deploying Conductor in such a way.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide