09-06-2018 09:42 AM - edited 03-19-2019 01:32 PM
Restriction tables all appear to be standard.
To test I've built a new one allow ???? and block 9??????????* (should block anything over 10 digits prefixed with a 9). The * is also allowed.
I've updated the COS to reflect the new table I built (and only use it) but still getting the same import error --
ERROR importing user (USERNAME) : The Extension or Phone Number or URI violated a restriction in the Restriction Table.
Honestly lost on where to look - there haven't been any changes to the tables as far as I can tell. Max length of dial string is set to 4, minimum set to 1.
Any suggestions on where to look? Using Unity 11.5.
09-10-2018 11:47 PM
Thanks for reaching out to CSC. After some research done, based on my research I suggest you to check:
1. Check if "*" is being blocked under 'User-Defined and Automatically-Added Alternate Extensions' restriction table.
2. Verify if length of Directory URI of user is greater than the Maximum Length of Dial String value assigned for the User-Defined and Automatically-Added Alternate Extensions.
The following defect has been created as an enhancement for this second suggestion:
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCva64904/?reffering_site=dumpcr
Hope this information helps,
Marco R.
09-11-2018 01:30 PM
Just turned out to be some poor language and mis-interpretations. Changed the dial max up from 4 and all set.
09-11-2018 01:30 PM
Just turned out to be some poor language and mis-interpretations. Changed the dial max up from 4 and all set.
03-23-2021 08:18 AM
In my case, I went to the end user, removed the email address from the Directory URI field and tried to import the user again and it was successful. Did not have to modify the restriction table.
Our Unity Version - 11.5
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide