06-16-2013 08:27 PM
Hi, I'm looking for clarification on the correct way to design the ports and port groups with Unity CxN 9.1 when SCCP integrated to UCM 9.1. My peticular design is pretty simple - 2 UCM servers (Pub & Sub) and a Unity CxN cluster all in the same data center.
Here's where the confusion comes in:
The 9.x design guide states that VM ports will register more quickly when a UCM server fails if 2 port groups are created with 1/2 of the ports set to, say, UCM server #1 as primary and UCM server #2 as secondary. Then the other 1/2 ports listed in reverse order. No other details or how to set up the hunting on UCM are given (more on that below).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/design/guide/9xcucdg050.html#wp1081995
A different chapter of the design guide does give recommendations for balancing the load of calls across servers, but it's pretty sparse with real details
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/design/guide/9xcucdg060.html#wp1057936
Then in the SCCP integration guide for 9.x (which, BTW, only references up to 8.x) there's no mention of creating multiple port groups. It only talks about creating one port goup in Unity CxN
But does reference the configuring ports for a cluster chapter here:
However, no mention of multiple port groups, just that you would assign the 1st answering ports to the subscriber server and the remaining to the primary.
So what is the best way to do this type of integration? Is it better to create the two port groups vs. just one and distributing the ports as documentated? Is the design guide method obsolete now with 9.x, or is the integration guide need a little updating?
Here's what I *think* should be done based on trying to decode the docs above and finding other blog posts that have similar questions. In this config example I'm configuring 48VM ports total with 40 for answering and 8 for dial-out/MWI.
On Unity CxN
On UCM
Could someone please clarify for me.
Thanks.
06-17-2013 10:20 AM
Stephen,
This community does not provide technical support and is not staffed with technical support experts. I recommend you post this and future technical support questions to the Cisco Support Community (https://supportforums.cisco.com/index.jspa) where our Cisco technical support experts provide assistance. Another option is to open a ticket with the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (www.cisco.com/go/support) to get expert debugging assistance.
We do encourage you to participate in the Cisco Collaboration Community and to also join our Cisco Collaboration User Group program! In the community, we encourage your discussion/sharing around collaboration topics and Cisco Collaboration Solutions, including business and IT requirements, industry trends, process, culture/organization issues, how collaboration can be used to transform businesses, vendor selection, adoption, training, architecture, licensing, and product features/functionality. If you are a customer or partner, you can also join the user group program to be eligible for member-only events and influence product direction.
We hope to hear from you again.
Kelli Glass
Moderator for the Cisco Collaboration Community
06-17-2013 10:07 PM
Stephen,
You might want to open a PDI Helpdesk case for this query. PDI Helpdesk assists entitled partners with their Planning, Design & Implementation queries. To know if you are entitled for PDI Helpdesk support ( complimentary support ), please refer http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/pdi_hd_overview.pdf
To open a PDI Helpdesk case, please go here www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
Regards
GP.
06-18-2013 08:27 PM
Kelli – thanks for the follow up. I did do the PDI help already and got an answer back. I didn’t realize I was posting to the community and not the support forums when I did this.
Steve
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide