cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
2050
Views
0
Helpful
6
Replies

UCS with C-Series Servers

roytgeorge
Level 1
Level 1

What do we need to create a standalone UCS with 3 x C210 servers

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

"Tentatively" mid Jan.

You are correct with the requirement of a 2248 FEX.   The LOM (Lan on Motherboard) connections for management would connect to a 2248 (which connects to your 6100) and the CNA dataplane ports on your C Series would connect direclty to the 6100.  

Regards,

Robert

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

Robert Burns
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Roy if you are referring to a standalone UCS in terms of a single UCS interconnect (6100) that will manage a bunch of C Series Rack servers, you would need the next version of software (1.4) which is not currently avaiable.  Tentatively this will be released early in 2011.

Regards,

Robert

Thanks Robert. Sorry but more questions .....

Early 2011 as in Jan or later ?

In addition to UCS1.4, I would still need the Fabric Extender right ?

So C210(with CNA)  -> Fabric Extn -> Fabric Interconnect

"Tentatively" mid Jan.

You are correct with the requirement of a 2248 FEX.   The LOM (Lan on Motherboard) connections for management would connect to a 2248 (which connects to your 6100) and the CNA dataplane ports on your C Series would connect direclty to the 6100.  

Regards,

Robert

Robert, what are the options to connect the 2248s to 6100s (per your drawing)?  SFP+ copper (Twinax cables) or FET-10G over MMF?  Why choose one over the other?  Thanks!

Connection options will be anything compatible with the Nexus 5000 series of switches and FEXs.  This can be Optics or Copper (Twinax).

In choosing one over the other I would base it mainly on distance requirements.

If you can connect the 6100's and FEXs within 10m then go with twinax cable.

- Twinax is about 1/10th the cost of optical transceivers and OM3 fibre cable.

- Twinax uses less power (0.1W for twinax vs. 1W per fibre)

- Twinax has lower latency than fibre.

If you need a length longer than 10m then optics would be your only choice.

Full details on transceiver compatibility here:

http://cisco.biz/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps10110/data_sheet_c78-568589_ps9670_Products_Data_Sheet.html

Regards,

Robert

Robert,

Looking for your input here on the rack-mount UCS integration.

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/345752?tstart=0

Thanks!

Randy

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card