03-20-2015 05:38 PM - edited 03-01-2019 12:05 PM
Dear All
I have a problem with a blade B200M4 to be discovered and identified in the chassis in the attachment (error4)
I tried to re-acknowledge the server or the slot but I cannot and received the error in attachment (error5)
but the B300M3 blade identified and discovered auto.
note: B200M4 didi not have hard disk
So what is this problem ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
03-20-2015 06:35 PM
Hi Amr,
Is your UCSM running at least firmware version 2.2(3a)? If it is not running at least this version your servers won't discover as this is the minimum recommend firmware version for the B200 M4 blade servers.
See UCS 2.2 release notes below:
Table 4 Internal Dependencie
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/release/notes/ucs_2_2_rn.html
Please let me know if this helps.
03-24-2015 10:24 AM
This remaining error is related to the fact, that you have the global policy: synch firmware enabled. and the default host firmware policy is empty; modify the empty one with e.g. V 2.2..3d.
Why did you choose a newer version for server bundle(2.2.3d) than for Infra bundle (2.2.3c) ?
In general, Infra server bundle should always be newer or equal to the server bundle. (see Table 2 Mixed Cisco UCS Releases Supported )
03-20-2015 06:35 PM
Hi Amr,
Is your UCSM running at least firmware version 2.2(3a)? If it is not running at least this version your servers won't discover as this is the minimum recommend firmware version for the B200 M4 blade servers.
See UCS 2.2 release notes below:
Table 4 Internal Dependencie
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/release/notes/ucs_2_2_rn.html
Please let me know if this helps.
03-22-2015 11:25 AM
03-24-2015 10:24 AM
This remaining error is related to the fact, that you have the global policy: synch firmware enabled. and the default host firmware policy is empty; modify the empty one with e.g. V 2.2..3d.
Why did you choose a newer version for server bundle(2.2.3d) than for Infra bundle (2.2.3c) ?
In general, Infra server bundle should always be newer or equal to the server bundle. (see Table 2 Mixed Cisco UCS Releases Supported )
03-24-2015 02:06 PM
thanks Walter
I'm sorry I used the 2.2(3e) infra and 2.2(3c) blade bundle and updated to 2.2(3d) for blade as in the attached fig.
I used different bundle because it's recommended from Cisco release note as in the attached (to use 2.2(3e) for infra and 2.2(3d) for b-series
when I decided to update b-series FW from 2.2(3c) to the recommended 2.2(3d) server 5 could not be able to update the BIOS FW although the update status is ready so I right click on the BIOS line and choose update and check force box then activate and it's working as in pic.
updated FW now shown in the attached fig.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide