Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello All,
We migrated from CUCM 8.6 to 11.5. After the upgrade, A call coming into XXXXXXX123 which is setup as a Cisco phone and then is being call forwarded to YYYYYYY123, The user stated they used to receive the number of the person calling an...
Hello All,
Per this thread and other Cisco documentation for CUCM 8.6, https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11683541/route-list-can-not-contain-qsig-and-sip-trunks, I see that Route group cannot contain 2921 MGCP QSIG gateways (In my customer'...
Hello Experts,
I am facing a strange problem with the CUCM. I have noticed that After I am clicking links within CUCM for a few minutes, it stops opening new pages rather downloads files like phoneFindList (1).do. Also, it doesnt allow me to enter ...
Hello experts,
Trying to upgrade (rather migrate) between CUCM 8.0.3 (Physical) to virtual 11.5 version. Will change to a new CUCM IP on the virtual platform after upgrade. Some questions:
1. PCD supports the upgrade per the documentation. Any gotc...
I think I found the issue. On one of the t1 endpoints, the Calling Party Selection is set to Last redirect number external. That's possibly causing the issue. I will test it but that may need downtime
Hi Chris, I can try that but being Production I am hesitant and it will need a lot of test cycles too. I will keep the suggestion in mind and will look forward to other experts to weigh in
Hi chris, Thanks for responding. However, if you see the original thread, it says this.
A MGCP-QSIG Gateway is Type 1
A SIP TRunk is Type 3
So they both don't work together as part of the same route group OR as two route groups part of the same rout...
