Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,Looking to upgrade our CUCM from 10.5 to 12.5 or 14, but noticed 6961 and 6941 phones are not supported, but not deprecated yet. We have many of these models deployed and cannot replace them this year, but getting lots of pressure to upgrade CUCM ...
Hi,I'm migrating from PRI to SIP trunk with new ITSP. I created new dial-peers and a test call from an inside phone to mobile number isn't using the expected dial peer 300 between CUCM and CUBE. Instead it's using an existing dial-peer 2. I'm not sur...
Hi,We have a new sip service but have not ported our numbers to the new provider yet. Surprisingly, it seems possible to make an outbound call using the new service with a non-ported number. Do providers allow calls from numbers that don't belong to ...
Two distribution switches connected to each other with bundled trunk ports using src-dst-ip load-balance and have an OSPF adjacency. They have SVIs in the same subnets as each other to segment different traffic (voice, servers, wireless, etc). Some ...
That is a good reply, but I was hoping to hear from anyone using, or tried to use, these models with CUCM 12.5 or 14. Hearing from someone's experience that tried these models would be helpful.
I apologize for confusing the network design. The routing table I referenced is more accurate than my attempt at using text to show the design. I was showing how OSPF and the trunk were formed between the two switches. Jon is correct and the question...
Most of the clients are getting IP via DHCP, which does allow for configuring multiple gateways. I'm not sure how well that works though. We also have servers with static IPs and the gateway is manually configured to use the closest SVI. I'm not cond...
Yes, it is a collapsed core/distribution.No FHRP being used.Are you sure OSPF would not be used for inter-vlan routing? Below is a snippet of ip route from one distribution switch when two VLANs were forming the adjacency. If a host on the 10.1.8.0 s...
Follow-up... Still thinking it's a load balancing issue and identifying traffic between two switches is using OSPF over a bundled trunk, I forced the routed traffic to VLAN 3 using 'passive-interface vlan 1'. Since then the download speeds are normal...
