Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello everyone.We are using vAPIC 6.0.5 with some C93180fx & C9332c as spines.Everything works fine, but when I create contact (in Application Profile-Topology), I cant submit & apply contact to my EPGs !As a tip, when I create a contract, the contra...
Hello community usersI've been using ACI Fabric in our SD-DC in Network Centric model ;In my migration plan and proposed design, I've faced some practical concept such as "Consumed Contract Interface";If my contract provider is in another tenant, sho...
Hello ThereI have 2*Spine (C9332) & 12*Leaf (C93180) in Bank Data Center.I want to connect each leaf to spine with two phys. links;There are two solutions:Port-Aggregate Links in Leaf & Spine (One L3 Link- LACP)L3 IP Add. Assign for each phys. link (...
Hello ThereI have 2*Spine (C9332) & 12*Leaf (C93180) in Bank DC.I want to connect each leaf to spine with two link;There are two solutions:Port-Aggregate Links in Leaf & Spine (LACP)L3 IP Add. Assign for each phys. link (OSPF Participate & Neighbors)...
Hi there,When you deploy ACI Fabric (apic with some nexus 9000) without any licenses, you should be face with "ACI_LEAF_BASE_10G" License."ACI Base License for 10/25/40+G Leaf Models: All EX and FX TORs except N9K-C9348GC-FXP"Your fabric would be wo...
Thanks, I agree with you because of:- Cisco DCNM/ Fabric Controller & ACI Build L3 independent Interface (Maybe it's Cisco best practice !)- When I use Port-channel and one link in Port-group fail, OSPF has no idea and feedback of this failure & ECMP...
