Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Platform 65k SUP2-T / 10Gig P
R1--iBGP--R2 <====eBGP====> R3---iBGP---R4
R2 and R3 linked over 10Gig ethernet type circuit - DC interconnect.
I'm currently advising a client on doing away with its IGP, OSPF. The organisation changes fairly constant...
Hi all
I'm aware of the common reasons why BGP routes are not installed into routing table, however I have come across a scenario which I'm struggling to understand why my ebgp prefix is not winning over ospf.
DC1CORE01#sh ip route vrf COSTA 10.3.0...
Really quick and easy one for VPN guru's out there .... Essentially, I'm setting up a backup VPN, but there's NO interesting traffic unfortunately and we need VPN up. So... is it possible? thanks in advance Ajaz
so this document lists support for some of the 3750 lines, but not all ... http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/compatibility/ise_sdt.html What I really need to know for is, is the 3750V2 also included ? Thanks guys !
Replying to my own post here.
Thanks Giuseppe. I see whats happening now. Essentially it came down to locally originated which assigns 32768 as you mentioned. The thing is while this prefix entry wins in the BGP table, its seem the router elects to e...
Hi Giuseppe
I get you though please can I update you on few points.
Redistribution is not mutual [as you may know] and takes place under the OSPF process as follows:
router ospf 10 vrf COSTA router-id 1.0.0.100 log-adjacency-changes auto-cost referen...
