Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About kyle woodhouse
08-18-2017
Stats
Member since
06-23-2010
52
Posts
20
Helpful
2
Solutions
04-18-2016
04:44 PM
Hi Johnny,
Thanks for your thoughts but I still think this is an issue with the Cisco license portal. If the HSEC license was not supported on the 1941, 2901 and 2911 then there would be no HSEC bundle routers available.
CISCO2911-HSEC+/K9
VPN ISM module HSEC bundles for 2911 ISR platform
CISCO2901-HSEC+/K9
VPN ISM module HSEC bundles for 2901 ISR platform
CISCO1941-HSEC+/K9
VPN ISM module HSEC bundles for 1941 ISR platform
And there would be no HSEC license for the 1941 on the price list.
FL-19-HSEC-K9
U.S. Export Restriction license for 1941 only w/ ISM-VPN-19
And the datasheet for the ISM-VPN cards would not state that the 1941, 2901 and 2911 were supported platforms.
Table1, Table3, Table4 AND Table5:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/vpn-internal-service-module-isr-g2/data_sheet_c78-682436.html
One of the reasons for the HSEC license is to enable support for the ISM-VPN module. One purpose of the ISM-VPN module is to offload work from the onboard CPU. In some situations with concurrent services enabled your onboard CPU might not be able to reach 85Mbps throughput because the CPU is limiting things. The ISM-VPN module which Cisco advertises as being supported in the 1941, 2901 and 2911 is supposed to help offload work from that onboard CPU and avoid issues in these cases.
The bottom line here is that Cisco says the ISM-VPN module is supported on the 1941, 2901 and 2911 but doesn't seem to let you add the HSEC license on your own. You have to buy the HSEC bundle or work with Cisco TAC to have them help get the license applied. They should really fix the license portal or update the datasheet to avoid confusing their customers. But that's just my opinion.
Cheers,
... View more
05-21-2015
05:09 PM
Hi, Has anyone ever seen this error or issue? Trying to associate the HSEC license to a CISCO2911 router and getting the below error. We have 15.3 IOS and the security license already applied so not an issue there. The issue seems to be with the Cisco Licensing Portal not allowing this particular combination even though the datasheet for the ISM-VPN says it should be supported. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/vpn-internal-service-module-isr-g2/data_sheet_c78-682436.html That shows the HSEC and ISM-VPN are supported all the way down to the 1941 router. Even further there are HSEC bundles available and licensing for the 1941 which proves the 1941, 2901 and 2911 should accept this license type. To me this just seems like a bug with the Cisco Licensing Tool that should be updated to allow the particular combination as it clearly is a compatible combo. Has anyone seen this before or have any thoughts? CISCO2911-HSEC+/K9 VPN ISM module HSEC bundles for 2911 ISR platform C $ 5,695.00 CISCO2901-HSEC+/K9 VPN ISM module HSEC bundles for 2901 ISR platform C $ 4,995.00 CISCO1941-HSEC+/K9 VPN ISM module HSEC bundles for 1941 ISR platform D $ 3,595.00 FL-19-HSEC-K9 U.S. Export Restriction license for 1941 only w/ ISM-VPN-19 N/A $ 750.00 L-FL-29-HSEC-K9= U.S. Export Restriction Compliance license for 2921/2951 C $ 750.00 Error: SKU is not supported on destination device platform2911
... View more
Labels:
04-13-2015
10:41 AM
Hi, I just wanted to see if anyone had found an answer to this issue or not. It appears that some with an ISRG2 router and various 15.2 versions of IOS are getting the below error even though they do not have over 225 tunnels or 85 Mbps crypto traffic. I found the below bug but the 2951 router we are seeing the error on has 15.2(4)M5 and the bug details suggest that 15.2(4)M5 sees this error fixed. Either the bug is not fixed or this is a different bug. https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCua21166 Symptom: Unable to form IPSec tunnels due to error: ''RM-4-TUNNEL_LIMIT: Maximum tunnel limit of 225 reached for Crypto functionality with securityk9 technology package license.'' Conditions: Even though the router does not have 225 IPsec SA pairs, error will prevent IPSec from forming. Existing IPSec SAs will not be affected. Workaround: Reboot to clear out the leaked counter, or install hsec9 which will disable CERM (Crypto Export Restrictions Manager). PSIRT Evaluation: The Cisco PSIRT has assigned this bug the following CVSS version 2 score. The Base and Temporal CVSS scores as of the time of evaluation are 2.8/2.3: https://intellishield.cisco.com/security/alertmanager/cvssCalculator.do?dispatch=1&version=2&vector=AV:N/AC:M/Au:M/C:N/I:N/A:P/E:U/RL:W/RC:C No CVE ID has been assigned to this issue. Additional information on Cisco's security vulnerability policy can be found at the following URL: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_vulnerability_policy.html
... View more
09-17-2014
02:48 PM
Hi, Leo is right and it should come as part of the kit when you order "800-IL-PM-4" Full Kit should include: Internal PoE module 48v PoE power cube Power cord for the power cube (2) standoffs with two notches (1) standoff with one notch (3) screws http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/800/860-880-890/hardware/installation/memory/880FRU.html#wp45561 If for some reason you did not get it or it fails and you need a new one you can use part number "ADP-80LB". I dont think Cisco will sell you this as a standalone item so you may have to look on Ebay, PChub or google to find a place that sells it. Good luck!
... View more
04-11-2014
01:38 PM
Hi Robin, Thanks for the update. I dont think the FUS is faulty. I've seen this a total of 5 times now on 5 different AIR-CT5508 units. They just wont update to 7.6 software no matter if you use the FUS or not. They just skip loading it like your example. I believe its an issue with hardware or the 7.6 software but there hasnt been enough reported cases to TAC yet for them to veirfy a fix. I did a TAC case and even asked that they escalate it but they said the only option was to replace it. They were very helpful but did not have an answer why it works fine with 7.4 but not 7.6. Let me know if you get anything different. :)
... View more
03-13-2014
08:36 AM
Thanks Scott, I am already working with TAC but he is escalating it to another engineer. Will update if they figure out whats causing the problem. I got the RTOS file from TAC so im aware its not the same as a regular image. Once i use the RTOS file the unit works fine again all the way up to 7.4 images. No issues. Just that anytime i use the FUS 1.9 or load any 7.6 image the unit does not boot. Do you know why trying the FUS 1.9 more than once would brick the WLC?
... View more
03-12-2014
06:03 PM
Hi, I wanted to see if anyone has had issues with upgrading to 7.6 images on their AIR-CT2504 or AIR-CT5508. I have one unit in the lab that refuses to update and I had a customer call me today with the exact same issue. Maybe someone from TAC has info if other users are having the same problems and can identify if this is an issue with 7.6 and to steer clear for the time being? Logs: (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo Manufacturer's Name.............................. Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name..................................... Cisco Controller Product Version.................................. 7.4.110.0 Bootloader Version............................... 1.0.16 Field Recovery Image Version..................... 7.0.112.21 Firmware Version................................. FPGA 1.7, Env 1.8, USB console 2.2 Build Type....................................... DATA + WPS <output omitted> (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) >show boot Primary Boot Image............................... 7.4.110.0 (default) (active) Backup Boot Image................................ 7.3.101.0 (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > !loading AIR-CT5500-K9-7-6-110-0.aes in the GUI now (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) >show boot Primary Boot Image............................... 7.6.110.0 (default) Backup Boot Image................................ 7.4.110.0 (active) (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > !reloading from GUI now (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > Updating license storage ... Done. Restarting system. WLCNG Boot Loader Version 1.0.16 (Built on Feb 28 2011 at 13:14:54 by cisco) Board Revision 1.3 (SN: FCW1709L09H, Type: AIR-CT5508-K9) (G) Verifying boot loader integrity... OK. OCTEON CN5645-NSP pass 2.1, Core clock: 600 MHz, DDR clock: 330 MHz (660 Mhz data rate) FPGA Revision 1.7 Env FW Revision 1.8 USB Console Revision 2.2 CPU Cores: 10 DRAM: 1024 MB Flash: 32 MB Clearing DRAM........ done Network: octeth0', octeth1 ' - Active interface E - Environment MAC address override CF Bus 0 (IDE): OK IDE device 0: - Model: STEC M2T CF 1.0.0 Firm: K1367MIX Ser#: STIM2MB513071013409 - Type: Hard Disk - Capacity: 977.4 MB = 0.9 GB (2001888 x 512) Press <ESC> now to access the Boot Menu... Loading primary image (7.6.110.0) 100% 36110929 bytes read Launching... <-- Right here it gives no error, just wont load 7.6 and moves to secondary image Loading backup image (7.4.110.0) 100% 34513219 bytes read Launching... init started: BusyBox v1.6.0 (2010-05-13 17:50:10 EDT) multi-call binary starting pid 821, tty '': '/etc/init.d/rcS' /etc/init.d/rcS: line 4: /mnt/bootsys/.core: not found route: SIOC[ADD|DEL]RT: Network is down mount: mounting /dev/cfa1 on /mnt/bootsys failed Set PLX switch MPS settings .............!!!!!!! Detecting Hardware ... set smp_affinity for irq 48 003f DP from CGE5.0 ... starting pid 1071, tty '/dev/ttyS0': '/usr/bin/gettyOrMwar' Setting up ZVM Exporting LD_LIBRARY_PATH Cryptographic library self-test....passed! XML config selected Validating XML configuration Read HA Config before validation octeon_device_init: found 1 DPs readCPUConfigData: cardid 0x6070001 Cisco is a trademark of Cisco Systems, Inc. Software Copyright Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco AireOS Version 7.4.110.0 Firmware Version FPGA 1.7, Env 1.8, USB console 2.2 Initializing OS Services: ok Initializing Serial Services: ok Initializing Network Services: ok Initializing Licensing Services: ok License daemon start initialization..... License daemon running..... Starting Statistics Service: ok Starting ARP Services: ok Starting Trap Manager: ok Starting Network Interface Management Services: ok Starting System Services: ok Starting FIPS Features: ok : Not enabled Starting Fastpath Hardware Acceleration: ok Starting Fastpath Console redirect : ok Starting Fastpath DP Heartbeat : ok Fastpath CPU0.00: Starting Fastpath Application. SDK-1.8.0, build 269. Flags-[DUTY CYCLE] : ok Fastpath CPU0.00: Initializing last packet received queue. Num of cores(10) Fastpath CPU0.00: Init MBUF size: 1856, Subsequent MBUF size: 2040 Fastpath CPU0.00: Core 0 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.00: Initializing Timer... Fastpath CPU0.00: Initializing Timer...done. Fastpath CPU0.00: Initializing Timer... Fastpath CPU0.00: Initializing NBAR AGING Timer...done. Fastpath CPU0.01: Core 1 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.02: Core 2 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.03: Core 3 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.03: Received instruction to get link status Fastpath CPU0.04: Core 4 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.05: Core 5 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.06: Core 6 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.07: Core 7 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.08: Core 8 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Fastpath CPU0.09: Core 9 Initialization and FIPS self-test: ok Starting Switching Services: ok Starting QoS Services: ok Starting Policy Manager: ok Starting Data Transport Link Layer: ok Starting Access Control List Services: ok Starting System Interfaces: ok Starting Client Troubleshooting Service: ok Starting Management Frame Protection: ok Starting Certificate Database: ok Starting VPN Services: ok Starting Licensing Services: LICENSE_PRINT:cnfgrCslLicense:ERROR:license request Failed for units: 500 rc:User failed to accept EULA ok Starting Redundancy: ok Starting LWAPP: ok Starting CAPWAP: ok Starting LOCP: ok Starting Security Services: ok Starting Policy Manager: ok Starting Authentication Engine: ok Starting Mobility Management: ok Starting AVC Services: ok Starting Virtual AP Services: ok Starting AireWave Director: ok Starting Network Time Services: ok Starting Cisco Discovery Protocol: ok Starting Broadcast Services: ok Starting Logging Services: ok Starting DHCP Server: ok Starting IDS Signature Manager: ok Starting RFID Tag Tracking: ok Starting RF Profiles: ok Starting Power Supply and Fan Status Monitoring Service: ok Starting Mesh Services: ok Starting TSM: ok Starting CIDS Services: ok Starting Ethernet-over-IP: ok Starting DTLS server: enabled in CAPWAP Starting CleanAir: ok Starting WIPS: ok Starting SSHPM LSC PROV LIST: ok Starting RRC Services: ok Starting SXP Services: ok Starting Alarm Services: ok Starting FMC HS: ok Starting IPv6 Services: ok Starting Config Sync Manager : ok Starting Hotspot Services: ok Starting PMIP Services: ok Starting Portal Server Services: ok Starting mDNS Services: ok Starting Management Services: Web Server: CLI: ok Secure Web: ok License Agent: ok (Cisco Controller) Enter User Name (or 'Recover-Config' this one-time only to reset configuration to factory defaults) User: admin Password:***** User:admin Password:******** (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo Manufacturer's Name.............................. Cisco Systems Inc. Product Name..................................... Cisco Controller Product Version.................................. 7.4.110.0 Bootloader Version............................... 1.0.16 Field Recovery Image Version..................... 7.0.112.21 Firmware Version................................. FPGA 1.7, Env 1.8, USB console 2.2 <output omitted> ! Now If i try the FUS file AIR-CT5500-K9-1-9-0-0-FUS.aes it completes successfully and i reload from the GUI (Cisco Controller) > (Cisco Controller) >Restarting system. WLCNG Boot Loader Version 1.0.16 (Built on Feb 28 2011 at 13:14:54 by cisco) Board Revision 1.3 (SN: FCW1607L035, Type: AIR-CT5508-K9) (G) Verifying boot loader integrity... OK. OCTEON CN5645-NSP pass 2.1, Core clock: 600 MHz, DDR clock: 330 MHz (660 Mhz data rate) FPGA Revision 1.7 Env FW Revision 1.8 USB Console Revision 2.2 CPU Cores: 10 DRAM: 1024 MB Flash: 32 MB Clearing DRAM........ done Network: octeth0', octeth1 ' - Active interface E - Environment MAC address override CF Bus 0 (IDE): OK IDE device 0: - Model: STEC M2T CF 1.0.0 Firm: K1367MIX Ser#: STIM2MB513071013409 - Type: Hard Disk - Capacity: 977.4 MB = 0.9 GB (2001888 x 512) Press <ESC> now to access the Boot Menu... Loading primary image (7.6.101.2) 100% 6394630 bytes read Launching... Loading backup image (Image not found) ** Unable to read "linux.bak.img" from ide 0:2 ** ** Launch failure ** ============================================================ Boot Loader Menu ============================================================ 1. Run primary image (7.6.101.2) - Active 2. Run backup image (Image not found) 3. Change active boot image 4. Clear configuration 5. Format FLASH Drive 6. Manually update images ------------------------------------------------------------ !Now i am stuck in the Boot Loader menu and the unit wont even boot up. I used the RTOS files and recovered the unit several times trying to upgrade multiple ways but no matter what i try the unit will not boot with 7.6. It works perfectly fine with 7.4. Anyone have ideas? Known issue? Other links with what seems like the same issue: https://supportforums.cisco.com/pt/discussion/12130001/air-ct2504-upgrade-failure https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12060686/wlc-5508-upgrade-software-76 http://omgili.com/thread/.wHSUbtEfZS6sY9oec8tRj1DNafRV3e2EmgIsn2U7n.0aLwe7IPHyQaQO5o5MalitJoQnElOrK8-/
... View more
Labels:
02-05-2014
04:40 PM
Hi, By support we were mainly talking about the documentation saying it would be supported. On the module support matrix and the data sheet they specifically leave out support for the 2921 and 2911. I already verified the combo will technically work on the 2921 and 2911. Its just a question of Cisco opening advertisting support through documentation thats really in question. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10536/products_relevant_interfaces_and_modules.html#notes "Note:Supported on the Cisco 2951-3945E" Also not sure i understand the line rate comment. The 2921 capable of wan performance greater than what a T3 can provide. Even per Cisco's own documentation says it can handle a full T3. https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2131637
... View more
02-03-2014
06:30 PM
Hi Blau, I am very familiar with how to pipe the show proc cpu command and exclude lines that have all 0 and i did this during the event but i did not save the output. The issue has not happened since so i cannot post output again but i assure you there were no processes that were using more than 1% of the CPU. This is what makes no sense to me. I am very sure it is the zone based firewall portion of the config that is causing the high CPU because that process is stateful but i still dont understand how the cpu can be at %99 without any command to verify whats using the CPU. Still playing around in the lab to test this but might open a TAC case if i cant figure it out. Thanks though!
... View more
01-31-2014
09:26 AM
I think my guess of it being the zone based firewall inspecting traffic is the best answer here. I just dont understand how ZBF can use the CPU without it displaying in the "show proc cpu sorted" command. Might open a TAC case to verify how this could possibly make sense. Pretty clear that incoming traffic is causing the CPU spike based on the graphs. CPU - 2 days Packets per second - 2 days
... View more
01-31-2014
09:22 AM
Hi, Memory utilization does not change. I have SNMP configured and can see the graphs so i know memory isnt changing. Will post some graphs in a second. I think disabling the internet facing interface would solve the issue but thats not the point. The point is, why is the CPU going to 100% without a process showing me its using the CPU. What is the point of the show process CPU command if it doesnt accuratly display processes that are using the CPU?
... View more
01-30-2014
11:17 AM
Hi, If anyone can help explain how the CPU usage on ISRG2 routers works I would greatly appreciate it. Normally when I see a CPU usage spike you can use the show proc cpu sorted command to see what process is using that CPU and then troubleshoot from there. But occasionally I have seen sustained CPU usage without any process showing its using the CPU. Example: CISCO1941 router CPU spike to %99 for 1 hour show proc cpu sorted shows no process using the cpu more than %1 My only guess is the router has ZBF configured and there is a file transfer or backup being software switched and is using all of the CPU it can get its hands on. I just don't understand why that wouldn't show in the show process cpu output as a process using the CPU. ATLRTR-1941#show proc cpu sorted CPU utilization for five seconds: 95%/94%; one minute: 97%; five minutes: 98% PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 121 3545996 16326613 217 0.15% 0.07% 0.03% 0 IP Input 84 768 106 7245 0.15% 0.05% 0.01% 132 Virtual Exec 93 514168 993813653 0 0.15% 0.11% 0.08% 0 Ethernet Msec Ti 2 86832 1586153 54 0.07% 0.04% 0.05% 0 Load Meter 48 63732 831382 76 0.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Net Background 50 25177852 1194371 21080 0.07% 0.03% 0.11% 0 Logger Message was edited by: kyle woodhouse Apparently the forums here dont support CONSOLAS font which is the best way to view router output. Note to forum admins ADD CONSOLAS FONT SUPPORT!!
... View more
Labels:
Created by
kyle woodhouse
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
12-26-2013
12:11 PM
12-26-2013
12:11 PM
Hi Dave, Just wondering if you ever figured this one out or not. We have a 1941 router doing the exact same thing. Crashing with the below errors. It crashes multiple time and then comes back up fine randomly. One thing I noticed is we have the same software version as you. Different platform though but I imagine if its a software bug it might be cross platform. It could also be one of the modules we have installed. It complains about the module in Bay 0 before it starts crashing. Bad WIC maybe? If you have any updates let me know. Router1941#more flash:crashinfo_20131226-192603-UTC Dec 26 19:25:53.043: %MAINBOARD-3-I2CRW_ERROR: Write failure - Device @ 0xEA, offset 0x00000000 on I2C bus 0 Dec 26 19:25:53.863: %PA-2-UNDEFIO: Unsupported I/O Controller (type 0) in I/O Bay. The I/O Controller network interfaces will be unavailable. Dec 26 19:25:53.863: %MAINBOARD-3-I2CRW_ERROR: Write failure - Device @ 0xEA, offset 0x00000000 on I2C bus 0 Dec 26 19:25:53.867: %MAINBOARD-3-I2CRW_ERROR: Write failure - Device @ 0xEA, offset 0x00000000 on I2C bus 0 Dec 26 19:25:53.867: WDC retrieval from quack chip failed Dec 26 19:25:54.023: %WAAS-3-WAAS_INVALID_LOCAL_DEVID: IOS-WAAS invalid local device id Dec 26 19:25:57.663: %MAINBOARD-3-I2CRW_ERROR: Write failure - Device @ 0xEA, offset 0x00000000 on I2C bus 0 For image: Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(4)M5
... View more
12-05-2013
10:04 AM
Hi Leonardo, I have seen this before and can confirm it is normal not to see any PID or Serial numbers with show commands. I agree its pretty odd that show inventory doesnt show this information and hope Cisco changes this with future software or hardware revisions. I believe the only way to troubleshoot the module working or not might be to loop it back to itself. This should make the ports show UP UP but you should only do this in a test environment as i cannot comment what effect this will have on production traffic. I know this works fine with 3750 switches to test the stack ports and suggest the same here.
... View more
Created by
kyle woodhouse
in Routing
in Routing
10-04-2013
11:23 AM
10-04-2013
11:23 AM
Hi, Sorry i think i found the answer. Seems to be a software bug with this IOS version. https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCud84346 Symptom: Using the c2900-universalk9-mz image may show in the show version output has having more memory than what is present Conditions: This problem is see only seen on 15.2(4)M or later images Workaround: None Known Fixed Releases: (6) 15.3(1.11)T 15.3(1.13.1)PIH21 15.2(1.2.3)PI22 15.3(2.3.1)CG 15.2(4)M3.9 15.2(4)M4 Known Affected Releases: (1) 15.2(4)M2
... View more
04-18-2016
Hi Johnny, Thanks for your thoughts but I still think this is an issue
with the Cisco license portal...
05-21-2015
Hi, Has anyone ever seen this error or issue? Trying to associate the
HSEC license to a CISCO2911 ro...
04-13-2015
Hi, I just wanted to see if anyone had found an answer to this issue or
not. It appears that some wi...
09-17-2014
Hi,Leo is right and it should come as part of the kit when you order
"800-IL-PM-4"Full Kit should in...
04-11-2014
Hi Robin,Thanks for the update. I dont think the FUS is faulty. I've
seen this a total of 5 times no...
03-13-2014
Thanks Scott, I am already working with TAC but he is escalating it to
another engineer. Will update...
03-12-2014
Hi,I wanted to see if anyone has had issues with upgrading to 7.6 images
on their AIR-CT2504 or AIR-...
02-05-2014
Hi, By support we were mainly talking about the documentation saying it
would be supported. On the m...
02-03-2014
Hi Blau, I am very familiar with how to pipe the show proc cpu command
and exclude lines that have a...
01-31-2014
I think my guess of it being the zone based firewall inspecting traffic
is the best answer here. I j...
01-31-2014
Hi, Memory utilization does not change. I have SNMP configured and can
see the graphs so i know memo...
01-30-2014
Hi,If anyone can help explain how the CPU usage on ISRG2 routers works I
would greatly appreciate it...
Created by
kyle woodhouse
in IP Telephony and Phones
12-26-2013
12-26-2013
Hi Dave, Just wondering if you ever figured this one out or not. We have
a 1941 router doing the exa...
12-05-2013
Hi Leonardo, I have seen this before and can confirm it is normal not to
see any PID or Serial numbe...
Created by
kyle woodhouse
in Routing
10-04-2013
10-04-2013
Hi, Sorry i think i found the answer. Seems to be a software bug with
this IOS version.
https://tool...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 06-23-2010 03:16 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2017 03:56 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 52 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 20 |
Helpful Votes Given To
.jpg "Hall of Fame Community Legend"){kind=icon}
Helpful Votes From
