Maybe a mail merge might get you out of trouble if Perl scripting isn't your thing..... I'd be guessing there would be a fair amount of mucking around to get it right.
Tavis,If it suits your requirements then ok. I thought all you had to do was add a route for 192.168.3.0/24 in the hosts on 192.168.1.0/24 subnet that pointed to the cisco router rather than the Linux router, and it all came good. I also thought that...
Tavis,Didn't we figure out that the linux router was generally a bit sucky? It all works better once that was out of the picture. ie putting a static route on hosts 192.168.1.0 subnet, for 192.168.3.0 doesn't it? Tony
Tavis,I'm not sure why the linux router is doing what it's doing. the trace route you had earlier looked like it was doing things right.As for adding a static route. a quick google found me option 33 on DHCP server, which adds a Static route to DHCP ...
That's interesting. That to me looks like it worked. But your saying a ping won't..... Considering they are the same protocol It may be time to break out the protocol analyiser and see whats happening on the wire.Tony
