Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Why on earth did Cisco not support the SFP+LRM module with their QSA CVR module? It was not until we installed our C9500-32QCs and C9606Rs did we realize we had major problems. It slipped by us -- I did a lot of testing and must have missed that poin...
We have FS optics QSFP-ER4-40G and QSFP-BD-40G that are not compatible with the two switches listed above. Tried code 16.12.4 and 17.3.2a in both switches...same failure with optics turning led orange and the non-compatible log note. The QSFP-BD-4...
Is there a way I can stop the logging of an error (errors) of specific numbers on the C9300 and C9500 switches. I am using non-Cisco optics and the errors I receive about dbm are irrelevant ....they are just cluttering up the log.
I am really confused on the C9500-32QC. Can I covert any pair of 40Gb ports to a single 100Gb or are there restrictions? Example ...document says 32 of 40G ports or 16 or 100Gb ports....then it also says you can have 24 40Gb ports and ...
We have one to two hundred 3750X switches and a few dozen 3850 switches in stacks. For upgrading some old sites we were planning to move up to the newer 9300 series 48UXM models. We manually configure our switches with CLI (using automated QOS comman...
Not sure I follow you.. the Cisco QSFP-40G-SR-BD (listed by FS as the QWSFP-BD-40G) works in our 9300 switches when we connect them together with this optics. I would suspect it should work in the 9500-32QC since it is listed as supported too (the ...
I may try that logging discriminator Nov 19 08:45:56.292: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Hu1/0/48: Tx power high alarm; Operating value: N/A dBm, Threshold value: -5.5 dBm.Nov 19 08:45:56.292: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Hu1/0/48: Voltage hig...
