Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
hi folks, does anyone has any experience rolling out/integrating Corebridge (www.corebridge.com) suite of telephony applications successfully with Cisco IP telephony offerings?thank you!
hi folks, are we able to utilise the WLC over a WAN connection? Say the primary WLC is at the HQ, and the secondary WLC is at one of the remote branches.If its able to support, what are the restrictions over the WAN? bandwidth capacity ?I understand...
hi folks, i've a client looking at deploying CME at 5 locations (Site A,B,C,D,E where A is the HQ), with each site sustaining around 10 employees. The sites wud be connected via a Hub(Site A) & Spokes (Sites B,C,D,E) topology, where each site susta...
hi folks, I have a client whos looking at integrating their existing keyphone/pabx system with a CCME system, consisting of around 10 IP Phones. Their intention is to have local outgoing calls made from the CCME thrown to their keyphone/PABX system,...
hi folks, I was browsing thro' the CME 3.3 administrative guide and noticed tt IP phone users of FXO ports (direct lines to the users) will not be able to do call transfer/call forward etc between the IP phonesDid I miss something or have I misunder...
Hi, have you found a solution to this issue? I have a end-user who's also facing similar situation. They're currently using the LOOP-E 1500-2S CSU/DSU via v.35 with WIC-2T. Same hardware & board revision as what you had depicted.The link between the...
Hi Shanky, Thanks for the suggestion. I'm not exactly familiar with the concept of gatekeeper. So does it mean I need to get the gatekeeper license for the ISR router, and at the same time, it operates as bas a CME & a gatekeeper? Or do I need to g...
Hi Rick, yes, I get what you mean by the DNS ip address issue.I believe tts where I went wrong. I do have the public ip address of 2 DNS servers on the ISP side. Am I right to followup the acl 101/102 with the DNS tcp port 53 with the following :acc...
Hi Rick!Oh, the accesslist which I had provide was errorneous. sorry about it as I had made some changes then.Yes, the desktops users are behind the FE0/0 whilst the FE0/1 is the outside connection. The are also other subnets interconnected via switc...
Hi Kumar, The user has requested the 192.168.100.0 (via F0/0; inside) network to be "Nat"ed so tt the desktops in this subnet will be 'hidden' from external subnets (via F0/1; such as 192.168.1.0 network). So am I right to say I will need to specif...