Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have Nexus 9500s and 9300s.
VPC enabled.
A router below is dual-homed to the 9300s
L2 Path is provided via VPC from N9300 to N9500.
Since N9500 is the L2/L3 boundary, I would like to establish IGP adjacency as below.
Is this topology/deployment su...
I have Nexus 9500s and 9300s.
VPC enabled.
A router below is dual-homed to the 9300s.
I would like to establish IGP adjacency as below.
Is this a supported topology?
How will be the behavior of OSPF neighbors, failover in this case?
Please advise, th...
Hi.
Are there restrictions and issues when F3 card is mixed with M2 cards?
I assume there's no more issue of L3 Proxy mode with F3 cards.
Please advise.
thanks
Is there any documentation about route preference if there are two routes received to a destination.
Next-hop PE for the destination IP address is same.
1. via direct iBGP peer to its rr-client
2. via ibgp to other Route-Reflector
I joined an XR into an existing ISIS IGP.
Just Plain level-2 ISIS configurations only.
I can see information in "show isis database"
but not installed in routing table.
Any comments?
thanks kbmoris.
I have read in the NX-OS config guide as well that attaching a layer3 device in a L2 VPC path is not recommended.
thanks for your assistance.
I have updated the diagram for clarity.
Based on the diagram, I thought from the persepective of router below it can form adjacency to both VPC switches (N9500s) on each leg - total of 4 adjacencies. Haven't simulated yet though.
Can your share any ...