Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About budilasmono
Stats
Member since
09-29-2005
31
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
Created by
budilasmono
in Policy and Access
in Policy and Access
07-24-2017
03:20 AM
07-24-2017
03:20 AM
Dear all,
Is it possible, for Guest to authenticate on ISE.
ISE will return the group vlan/list of vlan to the WLC.
And the WLC will assign/match vlan group/list of vlan to the existing flex-connect ?
By this scenario each guest member, which authenticated to ISE, will got different vlan (allocated on group vlan/list) with the same profile on WLC ?
Thanks a lot,
BL
... View more
- Tags:
- Cisco ISE 1.4
Labels:
11-03-2013
04:20 PM
Hi Dmitry, the 4000 hw switched label limitation on the ASR901, is it applies only on MPLS L3VPN ? or is it shared with EoMPLS ? Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in Service Providers Documents
in Service Providers Documents
10-19-2013
07:24 PM
10-19-2013
07:24 PM
Hi Alexander, I mean the xconnect on VLAN BVI. Because i can't found the configuration on BVI xconnect. So we got several interface associated to BVI 50. And BVI 50 actually only layer2 xconnect service. So how can i create vlan mode xconnect on the ASR ? int gi0/1.50 l2 and gi0/2.50 l2 is member of vlan 50. But vlan 50 is only l2 xconnect service. But i can't configure xconnect for bvi. Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in Service Providers Documents
in Service Providers Documents
10-19-2013
07:46 AM
10-19-2013
07:46 AM
Hi Alexander, is there any example to configuring VLAN Xconnect on ASR9K ? like : int vlan 50 xconnect y.y.y.y 1050 ! int gi1/1.50 encapsulation dot1q 50 ! int gi2/1.50 encapsulation dot1q 50 ! Please help... Is it doable on ASR9K ? Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in Other Service Provider Subjects
in Other Service Provider Subjects
09-11-2013
09:12 PM
09-11-2013
09:12 PM
Dear all, I've already install the Cisco Broadband troubleshooter 3.4 on the customer network. And when we do the Carrier to Noise ratio. The result won't come, and theres an error : Thu Sep 12 10:29:06 WIT 2013: ERROR: Poller.parseCMResult: Got a malformed line- 7cb2.1ba8.7650 10.82.205.103 C6/1/3/U1 online(pt) 1749!-3.50 2126 1 N with length=80 Thu Sep 12 10:29:06 WIT 2013: ERROR: Poller.parseCMResult: Got a malformed line- 0005.ca45.5b06 0.0.0.0 C6/1/4/U0 init(r2) 5293!-5.00 1958 0 N with length=80 Thu Sep 12 10:29:06 WIT 2013: ERROR: Poller.parseCMResult: Got a malformed line- c8fb.268f.7d44 10.119.47.206 C6/1/4/U0 online(pt) 5294!-4.00 1874 1 N with length=80 Please help, what is the meaning, and is there any configuration need to be change in the CBT ? Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Labels:
08-30-2013
12:29 AM
HI Nicolas, Lets says, there will be 6-12 ACL statement / ABF to each of 6 inside vrf assigned to the ISM. Does it has troughput impact on linecard MOD-80TR ? is the processor resource increase significantly / traffic throughput get decreased ? Thanks a lot, Budi L
... View more
08-22-2013
11:37 PM
Hi Nicolas, So in bundle-ether, we can configure in global vrf, and using ABF to set nexthop on 6 vrf to 6 ISM. I'm affraid about the process load on the router. I mean, we only got the RSP4, and who is doing the ABF, is it ISM or RSP4 ? Can the router doing the ABF for 6 ISM, and handling 80Gbps traffic in from subscriber ? Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
08-22-2013
09:41 PM
08-22-2013
09:41 PM
Hi All, We want to ask about ISM scalability issue. The issue are : 1. Each ISM handling 14Gbps of NAT translation. 2. We want to install 6 ISM module to handle 80Gbps NAT traffic from subs. 3. We only have one big bundled interface on the ASR router to the subscriber. the diagram : subscriber --- (gateway router) --- (ASR NAT router) --- internet each link is 80Gig traffic. (The gateway router) send all 0.0.0.0/0 traffic to (ASR NAT router) (The gateway router) have bundled-ether(8 TenGElink) interface to (ASR NAT router) (The gateway router) doesn't have capability to sort/classify/choose which customer ip goes to which interface to internet because of 0.0.0.0/0 to (ASR NAT router) What is the solution for this, so that (ASR NAT router) can : 1. Can utilize all the ISM prefered active module for all subs. 2. Can have only one big insidevrf assigned to bundle-ether (8 TenGE link). And this one big insidevrf applied to all 6 ISM module. 3. Can use the same insidevrf name for each of all servicecgn that assigned to each of all 6 ISM module. 4. Can use different insidevrf name for each of 6 ISM servicecgn. But the different insidevrf share the same private IP pool from bundle-ether, but different public map pool. (because gateway router only sending 0.0.0.0/0 to ASR NAT and cannot do which subs pool goes to which interface to ASR NAT using route-map/set next hop). 5. Can the ISM module be bundled in one servicecgn. And all NAT process is spreading accross 6 module, and from customer via gateway with default gateway without doing the ACL to specify source of customer pool go to specific interface to get associated with unique vrf that get assigned to specific which ISM doing the nat work. But instead one big bundled of 6 ISM to 1 ISM processing NAT. Please help. Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
08-22-2013
09:41 PM
08-22-2013
09:41 PM
Hi All, We want to ask about ISM scalability issue. The issue are : 1. Each ISM handling 14Gbps of NAT translation. 2. We want to install 6 ISM module to handle 80Gbps NAT traffic from subs. 3. We only have one big bundled interface on the ASR router to the subscriber. the diagram : subscriber --- (gateway router) --- (ASR NAT router) --- internet each link is 80Gig traffic. (The gateway router) send all 0.0.0.0/0 traffic to (ASR NAT router) (The gateway router) have bundled-ether(8 TenGElink) interface to (ASR NAT router) (The gateway router) doesn't have capability to sort/classify/choose which customer ip goes to which interface to internet because of 0.0.0.0/0 to (ASR NAT router) What is the solution for this, so that (ASR NAT router) can : 1. Can utilize all the ISM prefered active module for all subs. 2. Can have only one big insidevrf assigned to bundle-ether (8 TenGE link). And this one big insidevrf applied to all 6 ISM module. 3. Can use the same insidevrf name for each of all servicecgn that assigned to each of all 6 ISM module. 4. Can use different insidevrf name for each of 6 ISM servicecgn. But the different insidevrf share the same private IP pool from bundle-ether, but different public map pool. (because gateway router only sending 0.0.0.0/0 to ASR NAT and cannot do which subs pool goes to which interface to ASR NAT using route-map/set next hop). 5. Can the ISM module be bundled in one servicecgn. And all NAT process is spreading accross 6 module, and from customer via gateway with default gateway without doing the ACL to specify source of customer pool go to specific interface to get associated with unique vrf that get assigned to specific which ISM doing the nat work. But instead one big bundled of 6 ISM to 1 ISM processing NAT. Please help. Thanks, Budi L
... View more
08-22-2013
09:41 PM
Hi All, We want to ask about ISM scalability issue. The issue are : 1. Each ISM handling 14Gbps of NAT translation. 2. We want to install 6 ISM module to handle 80Gbps NAT traffic from subs. 3. We only have one big bundled interface on the ASR router to the subscriber. the diagram : subscriber --- (gateway router) --- (ASR NAT router) --- internet each link is 80Gig traffic. (The gateway router) send all 0.0.0.0/0 traffic to (ASR NAT router) (The gateway router) have bundled-ether(8 TenGElink) interface to (ASR NAT router) (The gateway router) doesn't have capability to sort/classify/choose which customer ip goes to which interface to internet because of 0.0.0.0/0 to (ASR NAT router) What is the solution for this, so that (ASR NAT router) can : 1. Can utilize all the ISM prefered active module for all subs. 2. Can have only one big insidevrf assigned to bundle-ether (8 TenGE link). And this one big insidevrf applied to all 6 ISM module. 3. Can use the same insidevrf name for each of all servicecgn that assigned to each of all 6 ISM module. 4. Can use different insidevrf name for each of 6 ISM servicecgn. But the different insidevrf share the same private IP pool from bundle-ether, but different public map pool. (because gateway router only sending 0.0.0.0/0 to ASR NAT and cannot do which subs pool goes to which interface to ASR NAT using route-map/set next hop). 5. Can the ISM module be bundled in one servicecgn. And all NAT process is spreading accross 6 module, and from customer via gateway with default gateway without doing the ACL to specify source of customer pool go to specific interface to get associated with unique vrf that get assigned to specific which ISM doing the nat work. But instead one big bundled of 6 ISM to 1 ISM processing NAT. Please help. Thanks, Budi L
... View more
08-20-2013
10:12 PM
Hi all, I got the problem in customer network. The requirement is : 1. to service private ip subscriber with more than 40Gbps traffic. 2. i only got 1 ASR9010 router with 4 ISM module 3. each ISM module handling 14Gbps NAT translation of my private subscriber. What is the best recommendation configuration for this ? Can we bundled all the service cng into 4 active ISM module ? Can we create one big subscriber private ip on service app1 and one big public pool on serviceapp2 that will be served by ISM module 1, ISM module 2, ISM module 3, ISM module 4 ? We doesn't want the pool/service app configured per assigned one ISM module, can it be done ? Another question, if from serviceapp1 from subscriber private ip, there are public subscriber ip, can we exclude the subscriber public ip not getting translated on the ISM/serviceapp1 ? Please help. Thanks a lot, Budi L
... View more
Labels:
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
08-13-2013
11:47 PM
08-13-2013
11:47 PM
Hi all, One of our customer have two of the ASR9K, that act as BGP and NAT router. They have ISM module installed. What we are trying to do, is to create nv cluster for two of the ASR9K for a single NAT process. The configuration is : - RSP-4G - MOD80 - 4x10GE module. Can the ASR9K support the nv edge to create single ISM NAT proccess for load balancing ? Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
04-14-2013
11:49 PM
04-14-2013
11:49 PM
Hi Andre and Samuel, We did not do your suggestion yet. Because the box is already on production network. My question is, if we binding the license to the line card, is it traffic impacting ? Is the line card going to reboot or the chassis going to reboot ? Or its not traffic impacted, and license just work immediately after we activate to the line card ? Thanks a lot, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
03-20-2013
08:18 PM
03-20-2013
08:18 PM
Dear all, Recently ASR9K generate this log : LC/0/0/CPU0:Mar 1 02:51:13 : rsi_agent[318]: %LICENSE-ASR9K_LICENSE-2-ADV_IP_NEEDED : 14 VRF(s) are configured without a valid license / license configuration for A9K-9001-AIP-LIC in violation of the Software Right To Use Agreement. This feature may be disabled by the system without the appropriate license. Contact Cisco to purchase the license immediately to avoid potential service interruption. But the devices already installed with A9K-9001-AIP-LIC : RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:CG-PE-05#show license Wed Mar 20 10:10:26.111 WIB FeatureID: A9K-9001-AIP-LIC (Slot based, Permanent) Total licenses 1 Available for use 1 Allocated to location 0 Active 0 Store name Permanent Store index 1 Pool: Owner Total licenses in pool: 1 Status: Available 1 Operational: 0 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:CG-PE-05#sh install active summ Wed Mar 20 10:16:32.806 WIB Active Packages: disk0:asr9k-services-p-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-mini-p-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-optic-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-doc-p-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-k9sec-p-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-mpls-p-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-mgbl-p-4.2.3 disk0:asr9k-mcast-p-4.2.3 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:CG-PE-05# The device also has ASR9001-RP and A9K-MPA-20X1GE module. So that means ? what we should do to enable MPLS VPNL3, VRF on ASR9001 ? Please help. Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Labels:
03-13-2013
12:30 AM
Hi All, please help, how to configure ABF IP SLA on CRS-1 IOS XR ? Thanks, Budi L
... View more
Created by
budilasmono
in Policy and Access
07-24-2017
07-24-2017
Dear all, Is it possible, for Guest to authenticate on ISE. ISE will
return the group vlan/list of v...
11-03-2013
Hi Dmitry, the 4000 hw switched label limitation on the ASR901, is it
applies only on MPLS L3VPN ?or...
10-19-2013
Hi Alexander, I mean the xconnect on VLAN BVI. Because i can't found the
configuration on BVI xconne...
10-19-2013
Hi Alexander, is there any example to configuring VLAN Xconnect on ASR9K
? like : int vlan 50 xconne...
Created by
budilasmono
in Other Service Provider Subjects
09-11-2013
09-11-2013
Dear all, I've already install the Cisco Broadband troubleshooter 3.4 on
the customer network. And w...
08-30-2013
HI Nicolas, Lets says, there will be 6-12 ACL statement / ABF to each of
6 inside vrf assigned to th...
08-22-2013
Hi Nicolas, So in bundle-ether, we can configure in global vrf, and
using ABF to set nexthop on 6 vr...
08-22-2013
Hi All, We want to ask about ISM scalability issue. The issue are : 1.
Each ISM handling 14Gbps of N...
08-22-2013
Hi All, We want to ask about ISM scalability issue. The issue are : 1.
Each ISM handling 14Gbps of N...
08-22-2013
Hi All, We want to ask about ISM scalability issue. The issue are : 1.
Each ISM handling 14Gbps of N...
08-20-2013
Hi all, I got the problem in customer network. The requirement is : 1.
to service private ip subscri...
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
08-13-2013
08-13-2013
Hi all, One of our customer have two of the ASR9K, that act as BGP and
NAT router. They have ISM mod...
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
04-14-2013
04-14-2013
Hi Andre and Samuel, We did not do your suggestion yet. Because the box
is already on production net...
Created by
budilasmono
in XR OS and Platforms
03-20-2013
03-20-2013
Dear all, Recently ASR9K generate this log : LC/0/0/CPU0:Mar 1 02:51:13
: rsi_agent[318]: %LICENSE-A...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 09-29-2005 08:06 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 05-15-2019 12:03 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 31 |
