Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Erich Schommarz
08-21-2019
Stats
Member since
04-28-2010
41
Posts
18
Helpful
1
Solution
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Routing
in Routing
04-05-2018
11:40 AM
04-05-2018
11:40 AM
In the meantime I have found a solution together with TAC Engineer. Further a Bug will be created to improve the public documentation. No mention in the release notes for this issue at the moment.
Minimum Required IOS Version: Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 16.07.01
Activiation & Verification
ROUTER1#show run | in boost platform hardware throughput level boost
ROUTER1#show license | beg boos Index 11 Feature: booster_performance Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium
... View more
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Routing
in Routing
03-27-2018
06:38 AM
03-27-2018
06:38 AM
We have purchased for one of our customers the Booster Performance License: FL-4320-BOOST-K9=.
Now I'm having issues with the installation of the license. I'm unable to install the license in the traditionell way. Anybody have any experience with installation of the BOOST License?
According to configuration guide: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/4400/software/configuration/guide/isr4400swcfg/bm_isr_4400_sw_config_guide_chapter_0101.html#concept_jzt_wlq_ybb
Cisco Smart License is required / described to install the license.
But I was not successfull with CSL, since TAC was not able to convert my license to CSL until now. Further I'm not sure if a certain IOS release is required to support the Boost License. All release notes I have checked I couldn't find anything about system requirements.
Enclosed how I tried to install the license in traditionell way:
rt01#license install flash:FDO21041AW3_201803230437045230.lic Installing licenses from "flash:FDO21041AW3_201803230437045230.lic" Installing...Feature:hseck9...Successful:Supported Installing...Feature:booster_performance...Successful:Not Supported 2/2 licenses were successfully installed 0/2 licenses were existing licenses 0/2 licenses were failed to install
rt01#show license Index 1 Feature: appxk9 Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium Index 2 Feature: uck9 Period left: Not Activated Period Used: 0 minute 0 second License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None Index 3 Feature: securityk9 Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium Index 4 Feature: ipbasek9 Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium Index 5 Feature: FoundationSuiteK9 Period left: Not Activated Period Used: 0 minute 0 second License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None Index 6 Feature: AdvUCSuiteK9 Period left: Not Activated Period Used: 0 minute 0 second License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None Index 7 Feature: cme-srst Period left: Not Activated Period Used: 0 minute 0 second License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted License Count: 0/0 (In-use/Violation) License Priority: None Index 8 Feature: hseck9 Period left: Life time License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium Index 9 Feature: throughput Period left: Not Activated Period Used: 0 minute 0 second License Type: EvalRightToUse License State: Active, Not in Use, EULA not accepted License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: None Index 10 Feature: internal_service
... View more
Labels:
Re: No internet access for guests after...
in Wireless and Mobility
10-26-2017
12:19 AM
10-26-2017
12:19 AM
We downgraded our two different WLC environments which we have. Didn't want to risk the upgrade to 8.3.132.0. Who knows how that release runs. Better a stable release at the moment than fix for this vulnerability.
... View more
Re: No internet access for guests after...
in Wireless and Mobility
10-25-2017
02:35 AM
10-25-2017
02:35 AM
We are facing the same issue with two clients of us. We are also running the SSID with Flexconnect. We think it is the ACL which is not assigned correctly after CoA. Still troubleshooting the issue.
... View more
06-29-2017
07:03 AM
Seems we have to wait till there is a fix for the following software bug: CSCve04418
From our environment I have seen the following:
Cat2960XR with bootldr 15.0(2r)Ex1 are affected
Cat2960XR with bootldr 15.2(3r)E1 not affected
Unfortunately no way to force bootldr upgrade.
... View more
06-28-2017
05:35 AM
I tried now Release 15.2(2)E6 and 15.2(4)E4. No success. Problem doesn't disappear.
... View more
06-21-2017
08:45 AM
We are facing the same issue with Catalyst WS-C2960XR-24PS-I. The affected switches are running 15.2(2)E5.
According to Bug CSCuv53498 issue should be solved with 15.2(2)E4.
According to Bug CSCve04418 this issue happens also on 15.2(2)E4.
In any case we actually shouldn't have the issue anymore with 15.2(2)E5 :-(.
Any experience from others from which release this issue is solved? Next try for us would be 15.2(2)E6.
... View more
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Other Data Center Subjects
in Other Data Center Subjects
04-18-2016
06:41 AM
04-18-2016
06:41 AM
Dear Community I'm fighting a little bit with the above HW and QoS. Good and easy documentation or examples I haven't found until now. So I hope that maybe somebody can give me some tips / examples how to implement. On NX-OS you have the following three "system qos" statements:
network-qos (Can be used for configuring MTU size and network wide statements)
service-policy type queuing (Used for ingress and egress queuing)
service-policy type qos (Used to classify traffic)
For Nexus 9504 MTU Size is configured directly on the interfaces. So in my case I will not use the "network-qos" statement. Ingress and Egress queuing I understand so far. My big issue is that I need to match / classify traffic and assign it to the accordingly qos-groups. So I progressed with configuring my "service-policy type qos" to match on cos and dscp. As soon I wanted to assign the policy I receive the following message: HOF-N9504-04412-01(config-cmap-qos)# match dscp 46 Only match cos is supported in system type qos policy So I progressed with configuring a service policy which matches on DSCP and can be assigned to the required interfaces. See below my configuration. As soon I wanted to assign it to the interfaces I received a message TCAM region is not configured. So I configured TCAM qos-lite and everything worked as expected. As soon I went into production not all interfaces came up due to not enough TCAM Ressources: Eth1/2 4506_HOF_03324_01 noTcamRes trunk full auto 1000base-SX In the meantime I removed the TCAMS for qos-lite and removed my service policy on the interfaces. And now I'm Stuck In Active :-). Always testing and rebooting due to TCAM carving makes live very difficult. More or less impossible. So my question to the community. Has anybody implemented QoS on Nexus 9504 based on DSCP? If yes, what are the config statements for your implementation (TCAM Regions, QoS Statements, System-QoS)? Any other value input for me which I have to consider? ! --- Service Policy for INPUT-QoS TRUST-DSCP-INTERFACES --- class-map type qos match-any PRIORITY-DSCP-QOS match dscp 40,46 14.02.1900 match cos 5 class-map type qos match-any CONTROL-AND-MEDIA-DSCP-QOS match dscp 16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,48 17.01.1900 match cos 2-4 class-map type qos match-any BULK-DATA-SCAVENGER-DSCP-QOS match dscp 8,10,12,14 09.01.1900 match cos 1 policy-map type qos DC-1P3Q_INTERFACE-TRUST-DSCP-QOS class type qos PRIORITY-DSCP-QOS set qos-group 3 class type qos CONTROL-AND-MEDIA-DSCP-QOS set qos-group 2 class type qos BULK-DATA-SCAVENGER-DSCP-QOS set qos-group 1 class type qos class-default set qos-group 0 interface port-channel x service-policy type qos input DC-1P3Q_INTERFACE-TRUST-DSCP-QOS Unable to perform the action due to incompatibility: Module 1 returned status "TCAM region is not configured. Please configure TCAM region and retry the command"
... View more
- Tags:
- nx-os 9504 qos
Labels:
10-23-2015
10:24 AM
Hi Thorsten Thanks for your Feedback. This is exactly what we have also tried (Was solution 1 in the above post, sorry if I have not explained my self clearly): 1. enable ip igmp snooping on all switches 2. enable ip pim sparse-dense-mode (You did ip pim sparse-mode). All communications (DANTE) is only in one vlan. What we tried was to move one of the devices to the same switch like the clock master and not even that worked (SYNC). Show commands on the L3 Interface "show ip igmp groups" and on all access switches "show ip igmp snooping groups" looked good. But still sync is not working for a few devices. Some work and others not. Devices are between different switches. This is valid for the ones which work and also for the ones which don't work. For the devices which we have problems the sync is not working at all. I think the only chance is to understand better how the synchronization works to find maybe a possible cause for it. But the integrator is not able to explain to us in detail how the application should work / how the sync is established in detail. Till now the integrator has also no experience on a Cisco environment. They have only implemented there solution until now on unmanaged switches. They are AV guys :-). At least now I know that it has to also work on a Cisco environment. Thanks for the mentioned steps Thorsten. I hope somebody else can improve from this post. If you have any other idea is much appreciated. If we gather new information to our problem I will update the post again. Greetings Erich
... View more
10-22-2015
10:00 AM
Hello Thorsten, ThusithaK1 Seems we are facing a similar issue. Have already invested some time in Troubleshooting. Our problem is that we have several devices which are synced and some which are not able to sync the clock. Affected clients Windows Clients / Atherotech. For the Clock Synchronization we found out that multicast is used. Dest. Port 319, 320 Multicast IP 224.0.1.129. So for communication between switches which have by default IGMP Snooping some configuration statements are required which are documented in the following document: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/68131-cat-multicast-prob.html We tried the following two scenarios: Solution 1: Enable PIM on the Layer 3 Router/VLAN Interface Solution 5: Disable IGMP Snooping on All the Switches Further we implemented QoS and have added CS7 / DSCP 56 to the Priority Queue. Additional information about ports, QoS can be found here: https://technet.genesis-technologies.ch/dante-networking-ports-and-protocols/ and http://www.yamahaproaudio.com/global/en/training_support/selftraining/dante_guide/chapter2/04_qos_settings/. But still the above mentioned clients are not synced. Also tried to move device to the same switch like the clock master without success. Do you booth from your experience have any further information which could help. More information in detail how clock synchronization works or what solved your issue at the end? Thanks for any feedback, Greetings Erich
... View more
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-30-2015
09:58 PM
09-30-2015
09:58 PM
Hi Leo Thanks for the second opinion. LLW I know. But as a Partner I only want to RMA devices if really necessary. It was also my first thought to do RMA and now I have also a second opinion and will proceed with that way. Greetings and thanks for your recommendation Erich.
... View more
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-30-2015
01:18 PM
09-30-2015
01:18 PM
Hello Together I need a second opinion to a issue I'm facing actual at a customer. We have one access point AIR-CAP2602I-E-K9 which boots, gets ip, joins controller but short after that crashes with a Unexpected exception to CPU and reboots. Anybody else had already once such a issue? Do you think more a software issue or hardware issue? Enclosed partial part of the log which ends with a crash. Complete output see attachement. Thanks for any feedback on this topic. Erich Log Output: Mar 1 00:01:03.267: Logging LWAPP message to 10.0.10.116. *Mar 1 00:01:11.947: %CDP_PD-4-POWER_OK: Full power - NEGOTIATED inline power source *Mar 1 00:01:13.047: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:01:14.047: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:01:14.143: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:01:15.143: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:01:19.295: %DHCP-6-ADDRESS_ASSIGN: Interface BVI1 assigned DHCP address 10.0.50.75, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname AP885a.92c0.c82f Translating "CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER.zis.local"...domain server (10.0.10.123) [OK] *Mar 1 00:01:29.251: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Did not get log server settings from DHCP. *Mar 1 00:01:39.251: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller *Sep 30 11:54:23.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.0.10.7 peer_port: 5246 *Sep 30 11:54:23.471: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.0.10.7 peer_port: 5246 *Sep 30 11:54:23.471: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.0.10.7 *Sep 30 11:54:28.471: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.0.10.7 *Sep 30 11:54:28.931: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down *Sep 30 11:54:29.007: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset *Sep 30 11:54:29.083: %CAPWAP-5-JOINEDCONTROLLER: AP has joined controller WAD_5508_C302_01 *Sep 30 11:54:29.155: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up *Sep 30 11:54:29.311: %WIDS-6-ENABLED: IDS Signature is loaded and enabled *Sep 30 11:54:29.383: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Received a upload request from controller for type 1 *Sep 30 11:54:29.931: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down *Sep 30 11:54:30.043: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down *Sep 30 11:54:30.051: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset *Sep 30 11:54:30.155: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down *Sep 30 11:54:31.031: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up *Sep 30 11:54:31.075: %DOT11-6-DFS_SCAN_START: DFS: Scanning frequency 5280 MHz for 60 seconds. *Sep 30 11:54:31.079: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up *Sep 30 11:54:31.091: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down *Sep 30 11:54:31.099: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset *Sep 30 11:54:32.079: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up *Sep 30 11:54:32.091: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down *Sep 30 11:54:32.123: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up *Sep 30 11:54:32.819: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: capwap_data_upload_proc: copy flash:/crashinfo_20150930-115017-UTC to capwap:/crashinfo complete *Sep 30 11:54:33.123: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up *Sep 30 11:54:58.799: %CLEANAIR-6-STATE: Slot 0 enabled *Sep 30 11:55:00.579: %CLEANAIR-6-STATE: Slot 1 enabled 11:55:20 UTC Wed Sep 30 2015: Unexpected exception to CPU: vector 200, PC = 0x12B7264 , LR = 0x12B7204 -Traceback= 0x12B7264z 0x12B7A48z 0x12B8714z 0x1ED921Cz 0x17FB3D0z 0x17FC844z 0x17FE118z 0x17D18BCz 0x143F330z 0x143AB6Cz 0x143AB6Cz 0x143F3F8z 0x1310378z 0x13101A8z 0x1312204z 0x1318CA8z CPU Register Context: MSR = 0x00029200 CR = 0x28824024 CTR = 0x017F5C34 XER = 0x20000000 R0 = 0x00000001 R1 = 0x05C5B668 R2 = 0x00010001 R3 = 0x00000002 R4 = 0x0326ED4C R5 = 0x039A0000 R6 = 0xE0040000 R7 = 0x00029200 R8 = 0x03020000 R9 = 0x03650000 R10 = 0x00000000 R11 = 0x0000420E R12 = 0x28824022 R13 = 0x2080F303 R14 = 0x00000000 R15 = 0x04260000 R16 = 0x761FCA4F R17 = 0x03652E1C R18 = 0x042E5980 R19 = 0x05EDEF18 R20 = 0x05FA02B4 R21 = 0x05EF02B4 R22 = 0x05EF02B4 R23 = 0x00000000 R24 = 0x00000050 R25 = 0x05FA02B4 R26 = 0x00000000 R27 = 0x0662A710 R28 = 0x00000002 R29 = 0x00000004 R30 = 0x00000002 R31 = 0x0662A5C0
... View more
08-21-2015
01:11 AM
Hi Jackson, Thanks for your reply. The mentioned bug is not public available. But I have found the following int the release notes 3.3.x: CSCuo98789 2 ARP broadcast for vlan which is not SVI punted to CPU incase of Layer 2 My colleagues will try to update the switch as fast as possible. Sure it will solve the issue. Greetings, Erich
... View more
08-20-2015
11:37 AM
Hi Jackson.ku Where you able to solve your issue? Seems we are facing the same as described by you. Greetings, Erich
... View more
08-20-2015
11:29 AM
Hello Together Somehow I missed the first notification about the about from glbeach. Further I didn't update my issue after it was solved. Sorry for that. Enclosed the final solution for me, which solved our issue: Feedback from TAC: Can you install the latest patch? Readme: http://www.cisco.com/web/software/284272933/125525/Readme.pdf File “pi222_Update_03-4.ubf”: https://software.cisco.com/download/release.html?mdfid=286236028&flowid=72882&softwareid=284272933&release=2.2.2&relind=AVAILABLE&rellifecycle=&reltype=latest Feedback to TAC From me: It seems to work. Have installed the requested patch. See the two screenshots for details. The CPU / Memory Utilization already worked again after installing the Release 2.2.2. But I proceed and also installed 2.2.2 Update 03. Conclusion Fix for the issue should be there. From the release notes I was not able to find the bug which I hit. But glad problem solved in that is all what matters :-).
... View more
04-24-2018
Actually this question was answered. Have heard that the SKU is now
available for upgrading Cat9300 ...
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Routing
04-05-2018
04-05-2018
In the meantime I have found a solution together with TAC Engineer.
Further a Bug will be created to...
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Routing
03-27-2018
03-27-2018
We have purchased for one of our customers the Booster Performance
License: FL-4320-BOOST-K9=. Now I...
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Wireless and Mobility
10-26-2017
10-26-2017
We downgraded our two different WLC environments which we have. Didn't
want to risk the upgrade to 8...
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Wireless and Mobility
10-25-2017
10-25-2017
We are facing the same issue with two clients of us. We are also running
the SSID with Flexconnect. ...
06-29-2017
Seems we have to wait till there is a fix for the following software
bug: CSCve04418 From our enviro...
06-21-2017
We are facing the same issue with Catalyst WS-C2960XR-24PS-I. The
affected switches are running 15.2...
04-18-2016
Dear CommunityI'm fighting a little bit with the above HW and QoS. Good
and easy documentation or ex...
10-23-2015
Hi ThorstenThanks for your Feedback. This is exactly what we have also
tried (Was solution 1 in the ...
10-22-2015
Hello Thorsten, ThusithaK1Seems we are facing a similar issue. Have
already invested some time in Tr...
Created by
Erich Schommarz
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-30-2015
09-30-2015
Hi LeoThanks for the second opinion. LLW I know. But as a Partner I only
want to RMA devices if real...
09-30-2015
Hello TogetherI need a second opinion to a issue I'm facing actual at a
customer. We have one access...
08-21-2015
Hi Jackson,Thanks for your reply. The mentioned bug is not public
available. But I have found the fo...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 04-28-2010 12:36 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-21-2019 12:45 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 41 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 18 |
