Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Wes Schochet
Stats
Member since
09-23-2008
70
Posts
10
Helpful
1
Solution
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Network Management
in Network Management
09-23-2019
08:40 AM
09-23-2019
08:40 AM
Sep 23 10:29:40.294 cdt: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'mab' for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000025):Orig. component type = DOT1X Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: audit-session-id [599] 24 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: 30 41 36 33 31 30 33 32 30 30 30 30 30 30 31 32 [0A63103200000012] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: 30 34 42 45 32 36 [ 04BE26] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: interface [170] 19 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: 47 69 67 61 62 69 74 45 74 68 65 72 6E 65 74 32 [GigabitEthernet2] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: 2F [ /] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS(00000025): Config NAS IP: 10.99.5.52 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000025): acct_session_id: 34 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS(00000025): sending Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS(00000025): Send Access-Request to 10.18.16.77:1812 id 1645/131, len 159 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: authenticator 7C 35 F4 1E 6D 2D 75 81 - 45 B3 9D 80 F9 89 93 BF Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 14 "acf2c5a5357e" Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: User-Password [2] 18 * Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: Service-Type [6] 6 Call Check [10] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: Framed-MTU [12] 6 1500 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: Called-Station-Id [30] 19 "00-06-F6-7F-47-DB" Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 19 "AC-F2-C5-A5-35-7E" Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: 2E 9B 8D 42 59 46 63 0C 79 67 F6 88 53 92 68 47 [ .BYFcygShG] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type [61] 6 Ethernet [15] Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: NAS-Port [5] 6 50212 Sep 23 10:29:40.298 cdt: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Id [87] 21 "GigabitEthernet2/12" Sep 23 10:29:40.302 cdt: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.99.5.52 Sep 23 10:29:40.302 cdt: RADIUS(00000025): Started 3 sec timeout Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/131 10.18.16.77:1812, Access-Accept, len 291 Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: authenticator F7 B8 F1 DC 8C CF AE 32 - 82 78 8D 66 FE CB 21 B7 Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 19 "AC-F2-C5-A5-35-7E" Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Class [25] 87 Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: 43 41 43 53 3A 30 61 31 32 31 30 34 64 62 47 36 [CACS:0a12104dbG6] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: 46 43 5A 47 70 6F 7A 67 65 49 42 45 34 34 4F 73 [FCZGpozgeIBE44Os] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: 75 58 68 52 64 77 6D 4F 6B 4A 79 63 6E 72 4F 61 [uXhRdwmOkJycnrOa] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: 6C 68 4D 78 57 4D 33 45 3A 76 63 70 69 73 65 70 [lhMxWM3E:vcpisep] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: 73 6E 2F 33 35 35 31 32 34 36 32 39 2F 33 32 33 [sn/355124629/323] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: 32 30 36 35 37 [ 20657] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: C6 A9 11 22 E8 6B B2 81 67 EF 9F 3D E7 80 C6 FF [ "kg=] Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 30 Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 24 "aaa:event=acl-download" Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 75 Sep 23 10:29:40.310 cdt: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 69 "ACS:CiscoSecure-Defined-ACL=#ACSACL#-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-57f6b0d3" Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 42 Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 36 "profile-name=Cisco-AP-Aironet-3600" Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: RADIUS(00000025): Received from id 1645/131 Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: AAA/ATTR: invalid attribute prefix: "ACS" Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: RADIUS/DECODE: parse unknown cisco vsa "profile-name" - IGNORE Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: %MAB-5-SUCCESS: Authentication successful for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'success' from 'mab' for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 Sep 23 10:29:40.314 cdt: AAA/AUTHOR (0x0): Pick method list 'default' Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000000):Orig. component type = INVALID Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS(00000000): Config NAS IP: 10.99.5.52 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: service [333] 12 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: 69 70 5F 61 64 6D 69 73 73 69 [ ip_admissi] Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: event [334] 12 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: 61 63 6C 2D 64 6F 77 6E 6C 6F [ acl-downlo] Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS(00000000): sending Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS(00000000): Send Access-Request to 10.18.16.77:1812 id 1645/132, len 85 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: authenticator 14 02 0D 26 A0 4A 8B 14 - E6 1D 67 E1 CA 5E 80 A9 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.99.5.52 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 41 "#ACSACL#-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-57f6b0d3" Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 Sep 23 10:29:40.318 cdt: RADIUS: 93 52 8C 5E 8B 0E BF E7 CC D5 2E 8C F5 73 6D 7A [ R^.smz] Sep 23 10:29:40.322 cdt: RADIUS(00000000): Started 3 sec timeout Sep 23 10:29:40.326 cdt: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/132 10.18.16.77:1812, Access-Reject, len 38 Sep 23 10:29:40.326 cdt: RADIUS: authenticator 97 96 7E 80 3C 69 23 CF - 27 CA 72 78 6E D9 24 42 Sep 23 10:29:40.326 cdt: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 Sep 23 10:29:40.330 cdt: RADIUS: 1D 76 CF 14 F9 AC 66 C0 B3 2D 38 13 05 80 DB D8 [ vf-8] Sep 23 10:29:40.334 cdt: RADIUS(00000000): Received from id 1645/132 Sep 23 10:29:40.334 cdt: %AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Network Management
in Network Management
09-20-2019
01:11 PM
09-20-2019
01:11 PM
I have some closet with relatively old 6509s that I am trying to configure for 802.1x and MAB. For my test case, I am using a Cisco AP which is getting profiled from ISE and added to the MAB group. ISE shows the authentication passing and returns Access-Accept. i am not sure what to add to the ISE response to make this work, or what else I may be missing. The radius debug shows authentication passing, but authorization failing: 05:46:20: DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 05:46:20: AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'no-response' from 'dot1x' for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 05:46:20: AUTHMGR-7-FAILOVER: Failing over from 'dot1x' for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 05:46:20: AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'mab' for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 05:46:20: AAA/AUTHEN/8021X (0000000C): Pick method list 'default' 05:46:20: RADIUS/ENCODE(0000000C):Orig. component type = DOT1X 05:46:20: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: audit-session-id [599] 24 05:46:20: RADIUS: 30 41 36 33 30 35 33 34 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 33 [0A63053400000003] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 30 31 33 37 39 43 [ 01379C] 05:46:20: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: interface [170] 19 05:46:20: RADIUS: 47 69 67 61 62 69 74 45 74 68 65 72 6E 65 74 32 [GigabitEthernet2] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 2F [ /] 05:46:20: RADIUS(0000000C): Config NAS IP: 10.99.5.52 05:46:20: RADIUS/ENCODE(0000000C): acct_session_id: 12 05:46:20: RADIUS(0000000C): sending 05:46:20: RADIUS(0000000C): Send Access-Request to 10.18.16.77:1812 id 1645/145, len 159 05:46:20: RADIUS: authenticator 6A 32 7F 9D AD 49 2B 27 - 51 64 C6 2A B4 2D 5B C5 05:46:20: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 14 "acf2c5a5357e" 05:46:20: RADIUS: User-Password [2] 18 * 05:46:20: RADIUS: Service-Type [6] 6 Call Check [10] 05:46:20: RADIUS: Framed-MTU [12] 6 1500 05:46:20: RADIUS: Called-Station-Id [30] 19 "00-06-F6-7F-47-DB" 05:46:20: RADIUS: Calling-Station-Id [31] 19 "AC-F2-C5-A5-35-7E" 05:46:20: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 05:46:20: RADIUS: 6F 23 BB DB 1D 0B AE FA 5C FC 85 13 F7 66 D9 8C [ o#\f] 05:46:20: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type [61] 6 Ethernet [15] 05:46:20: RADIUS: NAS-Port [5] 6 50212 05:46:20: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Id [87] 21 "GigabitEthernet2/12" 05:46:20: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.99.5.52 05:46:20: RADIUS(0000000C): Started 3 sec timeout 05:46:20: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/145 10.18.16.77:1812, Access-Accept, len 291 05:46:20: RADIUS: authenticator 0C 5F CE 59 C6 A2 C0 76 - 5B D9 19 46 D7 37 E0 57 05:46:20: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 19 "AC-F2-C5-A5-35-7E" 05:46:20: RADIUS: Class [25] 87 05:46:20: RADIUS: 43 41 43 53 3A 30 61 31 32 31 30 34 64 6F 5A 69 [CACS:0a12104doZi] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 51 35 53 6B 75 4D 4E 76 53 43 4E 56 44 59 5A 69 [Q5SkuMNvSCNVDYZi] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 43 42 77 78 59 2F 35 5A 37 56 62 47 63 6D 64 49 [CBwxY/5Z7VbGcmdI] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 36 31 39 6E 39 4C 69 4D 3A 76 63 70 69 73 65 70 [619n9LiM:vcpisep] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 73 6E 2F 33 35 35 31 32 34 36 32 39 2F 33 30 31 [sn/355124629/301] 05:46:20: RADIUS: 33 39 30 31 36 [ 39016] 05:46:20: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 05:46:20: RADIUS: ED A3 7B 3C 4B B5 D9 A2 45 1B A8 83 94 C9 DA 2E [ {<KE.] 05:46:20: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 30 05:46:20: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 24 "aaa:event=acl-download" 05:46:20: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 75 05:46:20: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 69 "ACS:CiscoSecure-Defined-ACL=#ACSACL#-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-57f6b0d3" 05:46:20: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 42 05:46:20: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 36 "profile-name=Cisco-AP-Aironet-3600" 05:46:20: RADIUS(0000000C): Received from id 1645/145 05:46:20: RADIUS/DECODE: parse unknown cisco vsa "profile-name" - IGNORE 05:46:20: MAB-5-SUCCESS: Authentication successful for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 05:46:20: AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'success' from 'mab' for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 05:46:20: RADIUS/ENCODE(00000000):Orig. component type = INVALID 05:46:20: RADIUS(00000000): Config NAS IP: 10.99.5.52 05:46:20: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: service [333] 12 05:46:20: RADIUS: 69 70 5F 61 64 6D 69 73 73 69 [ ip_admissi] 05:46:20: RADIUS: AAA Unsupported Attr: event [334] 12 05:46:20: RADIUS: 61 63 6C 2D 64 6F 77 6E 6C 6F [ acl-downlo] 05:46:20: RADIUS(00000000): sending 05:46:20: RADIUS(00000000): Send Access-Request to 10.18.16.77:1812 id 1645/146, len 85 05:46:20: RADIUS: authenticator DF 3F E7 86 3D 71 46 0A - 0F 37 F1 2F 04 F9 BF A8 05:46:20: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.99.5.52 05:46:20: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 41 "#ACSACL#-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-57f6b0d3" 05:46:20: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 05:46:20: RADIUS: DE 98 C0 1F 6C B0 48 27 DF 90 A9 2A F1 2F 10 C1 [ lH'*/] 05:46:20: RADIUS(00000000): Started 3 sec timeout 05:46:20: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/146 10.18.16.77:1812, Access-Reject, len 38 05:46:20: RADIUS: authenticator C8 D2 7F 60 6F 90 37 7A - A3 28 A1 1B ED C7 E6 04 05:46:20: RADIUS: Message-Authenticato[80] 18 05:46:20: RADIUS: F1 17 89 6B DE BC 79 D1 94 2A FF 09 9A 75 CF 3E [ ky*u>] 05:46:20: RADIUS(00000000): Received from id 1645/146 05:46:20: AUTHMGR-5-FAIL: Authorization failed for client (acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface Gi2/12 Thanks!
... View more
Labels:
04-24-2018
10:45 AM
I have a pair of Cat9500s that we bought for a DNAC / SDA lab. I am hoping that someone has a simple L3 config so that I do not to reinvent the wheel here? Anything you could share would be helpful!
... View more
Labels:
10-13-2017
01:16 PM
Hi All,
I have been using EAP-GTC for my iPhone users authenticating them against AD or LDAP. Apparently, there is some kind of change or bug (TLS?) that is preventing me from doing this in iOS 11. I'd like to stick with username/password authentication for my iPhone users, but I can't find an authentication scheme that will work. Anyone out there have a config that is working for a non-preloaded cert and iOS11?
Thanks
Failure Reason
12118 EAP-FAST cryptobinding verification failed
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
10-13-2017
01:09 PM
10-13-2017
01:09 PM
Just wanted to update this thread with my eventual resolution. It turns out that StayLinked has a setting to allow connections from specific ip ranges. of course with local mode, we were limited to a small range whereas FlexConnect introduce a huge set of new addresses. Once we made this adjustment, everything worked.
... View more
Re: MC75A Handheld oddities on FlexConn...
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-27-2017
12:55 PM
09-27-2017
12:55 PM
thanks for the suggestion, I give that a try. There is no VPN. Although it is a remote site, we have 3 10G Metro Ethernet links to the site. Worse case is 2ms delay.
... View more
Re: Had the same problem some
in Wireless Security and Network Management
09-19-2017
11:05 AM
09-19-2017
11:05 AM
This worked - thanks!
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Wireless Security and Network Management
in Wireless Security and Network Management
10-13-2015
11:01 AM
10-13-2015
11:01 AM
OK, I have enrolled about 50 iPhones through the BYOD portal. One of them gives me the attached error: The system administrator has either not configured or not enabled a policy for your device. Contact the help desk for assistance. I tired deleting the endpoint record and re-enrolling, but I get the same results. Has anyone out there seen this and solved it? Thanks, Wes
... View more
09-24-2015
09:55 AM
I get the generic "Connection Failed: Please check the connection parameters." when I try to test. I have logging turned up for MDM and when I take a look at the log (ise-psc.log), I see Java errors around connections being reset: isco.cpm.mdm.util.MdmRESTClient -:ce139402:9843967F63C7331B896A1505F5F29711:::- Connection Failed: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset This is consistent with the packet capture where you see the connection request attempt, then a "Change Cipher Spec" message, the a connection reset. See the attached pic. Thanks for your help!
... View more
09-24-2015
07:56 AM
I have been using ISE with the AirWatch integration for over a year. Recently, it seems that AirWatch has updated their certs and now I cannot get ISE and AirWatch to communicate. I can access the AirWatch API URLs through a browser and I see that the browser is using TLS 1.2. According to Cisco TAC, ISE does not support TLS 1.2. I have cases open with both TACs, but have not found a resolution yet. Does anyone have ISE / Airwatch integration working currently?
... View more
Labels:
09-24-2015
07:48 AM
Usually, when I have a failure like this, it comes down to CAPITALIZATION or spelling on one of the devices...
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
04-07-2014
03:04 PM
04-07-2014
03:04 PM
Thanks Leo - I did find the HA deployment guide very helpful. My concern here is downtime. Although it won't be much, I don't think I can make it transparent to the users like I do using the procedure above. I guess it'll come down to the cost and whether it's worth it or not.
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
04-07-2014
11:22 AM
04-07-2014
11:22 AM
I am working on a plan to convert some of my existing 5508s to be HA pairs. I like the redundancy i have now with multiple controllers, but don't necessarily like buying two licenses for every AP. I am trying to determine the downside to the HA mode. I am trying to figure out what a code upgrade looks like for a redundant pair. Currently, because I have 2 licenses for each AP, I have this process: 1. Load new code onto both controllers (no reboot here) 2. move the APs from controller A to controller B, 3. Reboot controller A to new code 4. Predownload new code from controller B to APs 5. Slowly move APs back to controller A so that there is no real outage. Clients move to adjacent APs as each AP is individually rebooted. Is there a way I can take an HA member out of service, upgrade it and move the APs to it before doing the other HA member? Or does the whole HA pair have to be down to facilitate a code upgrade? Curious to hear what others are doing. Thanks
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
01-15-2014
07:38 AM
01-15-2014
07:38 AM
Hi All- I am starting a project to replace several hundred 1131 APs with new 3702 APs. I am trying to develop a procedure for doing this in PI 1.4. The "copy and replace" AP function seems pretty cumbersome. Perhaps I am doing this wrong? I search for the old AP, select copy and replace from the drop down and then click Go. The list that comes up is all APs that already seem to have map locations. I don;t see my replacement AP, which is now registered to a controller, in the list. The documentation on this is not very clear. It's be great if there was some way to do it from the command line. If anyone has done this successfully, I'd sure appreciate some info on how to do it! Thanks, Wes
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
12-18-2013
08:21 AM
12-18-2013
08:21 AM
Thanks
... View more
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Network Management
09-23-2019
09-23-2019
Sep 23 10:29:40.294 cdt: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'mab' for client
(acf2.c5a5.357e) on Interface G...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Network Management
09-20-2019
09-20-2019
I have some closet with relatively old 6509s that I am trying to
configure for 802.1x and MAB. For m...
04-24-2018
I have a pair of Cat9500s that we bought for a DNAC / SDA lab. I am
hoping that someone has a simple...
10-13-2017
Hi All, I have been using EAP-GTC for my iPhone users authenticating
them against AD or LDAP. Appare...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
10-13-2017
10-13-2017
Just wanted to update this thread with my eventual resolution. It turns
out that StayLinked has a se...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
09-27-2017
09-27-2017
thanks for the suggestion, I give that a try. There is no VPN. Although
it is a remote site, we have...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Wireless Security and Network Management
09-19-2017
09-19-2017
This worked - thanks!
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Wireless Security and Network Management
10-13-2015
10-13-2015
OK, I have enrolled about 50 iPhones through the BYOD portal. One of
them gives me the attached erro...
09-24-2015
I get the generic "Connection Failed: Please check the connection
parameters." when I try to test. I...
09-24-2015
I have been using ISE with the AirWatch integration for over a year.
Recently, it seems that AirWatc...
09-24-2015
Usually, when I have a failure like this, it comes down to
CAPITALIZATION or spelling on one of the ...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
04-07-2014
04-07-2014
Thanks Leo - I did find the HA deployment guide very helpful. My concern
here is downtime. Although ...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
04-07-2014
04-07-2014
I am working on a plan to convert some of my existing 5508s to be HA
pairs. I like the redundancy i ...
Created by
Wes Schochet
in Other Wireless - Mobility Subjects
01-15-2014
01-15-2014
Hi All-I am starting a project to replace several hundred 1131 APs with
new 3702 APs. I am trying to...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 09-23-2008 06:09 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 09-25-2019 12:21 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 70 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 10 |
Helpful Votes Given To
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 5 | |
| 2 | |
| 10 | |
| 15 | |
| 7 |
.jpg "Hall of Fame Master"){kind=icon}
