Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About rhub
Online
rhub
Beginner
Expertise:
Switching & Routing
Datacenter-Technologies (Nexus, UCS)
Recent Badges
Stats
Member since
08-05-2003
97
Posts
12
Helpful
0
Solutions
11-09-2016
01:26 AM
Hi all,
I fully agree with Nayan and all the others, who are hit by this problem; it can't be a solution to put a single switch in place behind a pair of NX 9300. This has to be fixed immediately.
We had an old Catalyst 4510R in place before, which we replaced by NX9300. Before it worked perfectly and now we are spending hours and hours trying to find a solution.
We are dealing with this for more than a year now and the customers are getting impatient.
Cheers
Roman
... View more
05-15-2016
03:43 AM
I'm fully aware of the bug and parity errors. According to TAC the bug has not been fixed in our running release.
We re-seated the linecard in question and it's ok now.
... View more
05-15-2016
03:40 AM
No, we did not. I recommended the customer to use ITD as loadbalancing mechanism instead of MS NLB. This means that we had to buy the network services license for the 2 Nexus.
Until now we don't have new feature in place due to some time constraints @the customer.
... View more
Hi Mark,
that's exactly the case; I just received an answer from TAC saying the same; the bug was not fixed and therefore carried over to the release we're running.
I'm adviced to upgrade to 15.1.2-SY7
Best regards
Roman
... View more
Hi Marc,
I know this bug but according to the TAC engineer it should be resolved in our running release
... View more
Hi Tiago,
I'm facing exactly the same within the same environment but we're running IOS 15.1.2.SY4.
I opened a TAC-case
Greetings
Roman
... View more
04-26-2016
08:22 AM
Hi Juan and Neno,
we upgraded all 3560-switches with IOS 15.0.2. but I did not have the possibility to test it; I will do it asap and let you know abut the results.
Best regards
Roman
... View more
Hi Leo
many thanks for your reply; I fully agree with you; I'm also familiar with the "recommendations", but I have some of the 3560x running with 15.x without any problems.
... View more
02-18-2016
12:42 AM
We have different IOS versions running; we will upgrade coming Sunday to 15.0.2-SE9 (recommended)
... View more
02-17-2016
11:39 PM
I've seen that many discussions already have been raised about the high CPU utilization of the Hulc LED process on 3560X-48PS. We face the same issue on all of our 3560X with Hulc LED process of around 20% to sometimes 40%. Displaying the process cpu history shows that it is constant around 40%.
We also face performance issues on the devices with the Hulc LED process around 40%. It is the only process with this high utilization.
I read different infos about the purpose of this process, reaching from checking layer 2 traffic to checking the ports (PoE etc.).
Can anyone finally explain:
1. The purpose of the Hulc LED process
2. Why the CPU utilization of 20% is a normal condition ? In my opinion this far to high
3. Can the process be influenced by changing the configs (I read in one post that the command "switchport trunk allowed vlan ...." on the uplinks solved the problem)
Any hints and tips are very welcome
Regards
Roman
... View more
Labels:
07-03-2015
03:38 AM
Hi Nicolas, thank you very much for your reply.I've already checked CSCuq03168. Do you eventually have any infos about the timeframe Nexus 9300 will support this deployment ? In the meantime we configured the MS-NLB to unicast without following TAC doc 118951. Unfortunately we were not very successful - we were even not able to access the VIP anymore. So my next thought is to try IGMP, which is supported on MS NLB running under Windows Server 2008 R2. Do you have any experience with this ? I really appreciate again your reply
... View more
07-01-2015
02:43 AM
Hi Neno, This has been resolved by upgrading the switches to the newest release.
... View more
06-26-2015
07:28 AM
Hi all, I have the following setup: 2 Nexus 9372PX (NX-OS Release 7.0(3)I1(1a) ) in a VPC-Configuration 4 Nexus 2248TP-E, 2 are attached to Nexus_1, 2 are attached to Nexus_2 Attached to one of the FEXs is a Microsoft NLB (mac_addr 03bf.0a04.023c, ip_addr 10.4.2.60), which is configured for Multicast-Support. Customer is using Microsoft NLB for MS Exchange. I've added a static ARP-entry on both 9372PX (see below) interface Vlan42 ip address 10.4.2.254/24 no ipv6 redirects ip arp 10.4.2.60 03BF.0A04.023C hsrp version 2 hsrp 42 preempt ip 10.4.2.1 ip dhcp relay address 10.4.2.100 ip dhcp relay address 10.4.2.101 Clients are connected to several VLANs, eg. VLAN 8 (10.6.8.0/24); SVIs are configured on the Nexus 9372PX. I tried to add the following command which gave me the error-msg since this is obviously not supported on Nexus 9372PX. mac address-table static 03BF.0A04.023C vlan 42 interface po 41 ERROR: Multicast/Broadcast MACs are not supported! Since we migrated from an old Catalyst 4510R, we are facing extremely slow response-times or even time-outs in MS Outlook. We are looking for a good workaround. Any hint or tipps are very much appreciated. Best regards Roman
... View more
Labels:
05-13-2015
05:48 AM
Hi Jason many thanks for your reply. We tries this according to your suggestions but for some reason, we don't get it printed as we see it on the screen, where the output seems to be correct and in German. We will try any further
... View more
11-09-2016
Hi all, I fully agree with Nayan and all the others, who are hit by this
problem; it can't be a solu...
07-29-2016
Hi Vitor,thank you very much for your reply. I'm glad to see that you
did not have any issues and YE...
07-28-2016
Customer has Nexus 7009 running NX-OS 6.1(3). We would like to upgrade
the switches to NX-OS 6.2(16)...
05-15-2016
I'm fully aware of the bug and parity errors. According to TAC the bug
has not been fixed in our run...
05-15-2016
No, we did not. I recommended the customer to use ITD as loadbalancing
mechanism instead of MS NLB. ...
04-26-2016
Hi Juan and Neno, we upgraded all 3560-switches with IOS 15.0.2. but I
did not have the possibility ...
02-18-2016
We have different IOS versions running; we will upgrade coming Sunday to
15.0.2-SE9 (recommended)
07-03-2015
Hi Nicolas,thank you very much for your reply.I've already checked
CSCuq03168. Do you eventually hav...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 08-05-2003 10:04 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-22-2019 09:22 PM |
| Total Messages Posted | 97 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 12 |
Helpful Votes Given To
