No idea, but you could look at the interface usage, if all the traffic goes through the tunnel. ... View more

I can't see anything wrong. How much packet loss do you actually have? A little bit (like every 10th packet) is normal. ... View more

Hmm ok. If you run the test now again, do you get the same result once more? How is the current CPU load on the WLC if you connect to the webinterface? ... View more

That completely depends on the data those users are expected to transfer! I can't guess that. Do they need to watch/edit 4k videos over the link? Is it just e-mail and Word? .... Once you know how much data they can/should transfer, add another 20% for the encryption, just to be on the safe side. ... View more

Two things, upgrade the other WLC also to 8.0.152.0 instead of 8.0.133.0. Second, the bandwidth completely depends on the usage scenario. The encryption itself adds maybe 5-10% overhead (I guess). Now you must find out how much data your users might transfer, add the overhead, remove the amount that can be locally split away and you have a guess. ... View more

Could be caused by the CLI analyzer, but there is also a small chance that you are hitting a bug. Do you use the guest portal functionality? ... View more

What version of WLC code? ... View more

As far as I remember, you can always increase the core count and reboot the CMX. So I would start with 20 and if it's not enough, increase. Please be aware about VMware Co-Stopping troubles if you provide to many CPU cores to a VM: https://www.opvizor.com/vmware-cpu-co-stop-and-sql-server-performance ... View more

Now, or while the Ping latency was high? It might also be a hung process on the WLC, but there I can't help. ... View more

You don't have a second 1832I for testing? How is the latency in the Ping tests? ... View more

This could indicate an overloaded connection between the WLC and the switch it's attached to, or overloaded CPU on the WLC. Please check, once it happens again, the used bandwidth of the wire and the CPU load. ... View more

Depends on what you want to use and what printing protocols you want to use. I would probably also do an ACL only in one way direction granular, in the other direction fairly open. ... View more

Was the other device also an 1310g AP? If yes, then the AP is maybe broken. ... View more

I also suggest going the ACL on VLAN solution. That way you can block the "printers" from talking to your internal network and the other way around. Those printers also probably don't need internet, so I would block that too. That way the SSID will get very boring for other uses. ... View more

Which version is running on the 9800-CL? Please note, it first tries to contact 172.16.1.5 and afterwards 172.16.1.4, which is which WLC? ... View more