Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About _Chris_
Stats
Member since
08-16-2018
19
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
02-12-2020
08:24 AM
Hello, Still a new network guy here. Our organization is interested in changing the current 192.x.x.x ip addresses to a 10.x.x.x scheme. I have given interfaces IP's before and created DHCP pools before in labs... but I have not transitioned an existing (in production) config to a new one. I'm not sure if I start with configuring a separate interface first or make changes to the existing interface that is in production?
... View more
Labels:
02-12-2020
08:10 AM
I found that I was not matching completely. Once I matched the new interfaces with existing interface configs, it worked. Thank you.
... View more
02-04-2020
04:27 PM
I see. I will have to check it tomorrow as I have headed home for the day. - Thank you.
... View more
02-04-2020
03:57 PM
I'm pretty sure I do. I just need to locate it. Once I do, then I could enter NAT commands in THAT device?
... View more
02-04-2020
03:29 PM
Thank you for the reply. A majority of this network is using 192.168.x.x for their ip addresses. Would it still work with this current config if I added those NAT commands you mentioned? Im just a little confused since we are using 192.168 and the provider gave us 64.183 addresses. AVTA_SW_Admin-1#sh ip route Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP + - replicated route, % - next hop override Gateway of last resort is 192.168.2.1 to network 0.0.0.0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.1 10.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets S 10.1.7.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.236 S 10.1.8.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.237 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 172.16.1.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan172 L 172.16.1.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan172 C 192.168.2.0/23 is directly connected, Vlan2 192.168.2.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets L 192.168.2.5 is directly connected, Vlan2 192.168.10.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10 L 192.168.10.5/32 is directly connected, Vlan10 Thank you
... View more
02-04-2020
02:17 PM
Hello, I believe this may have to do with editing my routing table... I am still a newcomer to the CCNA world and I am working with the back-end of our network. My supervisor informed me that we had just purchased new IP addresses and I have confirmed with the provider that they are now usable. My question is, how can I get these IP addresses to work on my network and assign a device with one of these new ip addresses? These are the addresses that were given: Network: 64.183.103.x Gateway: 64.183.103.x Usable: 64.183.x.x THRU 64.183.x.x /28 255.255.255.240 DNS1: 209.18.47.61 DNS2: 209.18.47.62
... View more
Labels:
01-15-2020
02:34 PM
If I set to default and only add those configs wont there be a mismatch in speed and duplex? here is the ether summary after those configs: Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel I - stand-alone s - suspended H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator M - not in use, minimum links not met u - unsuitable for bundling w - waiting to be aggregated d - default port Number of channel-groups in use: 3 Number of aggregators: 3 Group Port-channel Protocol Ports ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------- 1 Po1(SU) - Gi0/27(D) Gi0/29(D) Gi0/49(P) Gi0/50(P)
... View more
01-15-2020
02:08 PM
I read it was possible here: https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/mixing-copper-fiber-ports-in-an-etherchannel/td-p/1498121
... View more
01-15-2020
02:01 PM
This is with the no shut command: GigabitEthernet0/27 unassigned YES unset down down GigabitEthernet0/29 unassigned YES unset down down GigabitEthernet0/35 unassigned YES unset down down GigabitEthernet0/36 unassigned YES unset down down They still remain down.
... View more
01-15-2020
01:56 PM
Yes. Fiber is the existing bundle and trying to add 2 more copper lines to the bundle.
... View more
01-15-2020
01:45 PM
Thank you for the reply. I have them in the shutdown state on purpose for now. But even when I do a NO SHUT they still stay down.
... View more
01-15-2020
01:39 PM
Hello, Can someone please help me understand why 2 ports I am trying to add to an existing channel group are not coming up? Shows as status down and line protocol down. The current Etherchannel group has two fiber cables (1gig each) and I am trying to add two copper (1gig each) to the group. Speed, Duplex, and Bandwidth are the same all around. Here are my configs for the 2 switches: Switch 1: interface Port-channel1 description TRUNK-TO-ADMIN-1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk interface GigabitEthernet0/49 <------- FIBER description TRUNK-TO-ADMIN-1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk channel-group 1 mode on ! interface GigabitEthernet0/50 <--------FIBER description TRUNK-TO-ADMIN-1 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk channel-group 1 mode on These are the ports I have tried to add to Switch 1: interface GigabitEthernet0/35 <-------COPPER switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk bandwidth 1000000 shutdown speed 1000 duplex full channel-group 1 mode on ! interface GigabitEthernet0/36 <-------COPPER switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk bandwidth 1000000 shutdown speed 1000 duplex full channel-group 1 mode on Switch 2: interface Port-channel1 description PORT-CHANNEL-TO-OPS-4 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk interface GigabitEthernet0/49 description PORT-CHANNEL-TO-OPS-4 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk channel-group 1 mode on interface GigabitEthernet0/50 description PORT-CHANNEL-TO-OPS-4 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk channel-group 1 mode on These are the ports I have tried to add to Switch 2: interface GigabitEthernet0/27 <-----COPPER switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk bandwidth 1000000 speed 1000 duplex full channel-group 1 mode on interface GigabitEthernet0/29 <-----COPPER switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 2 switchport mode trunk bandwidth 1000000 speed 1000 duplex full channel-group 1 mode on
... View more
Labels:
Created by
_Chris_
in Network Management
in Network Management
08-23-2018
03:48 PM
08-23-2018
03:48 PM
This is not for a stack. The device is a 2960-CX. It's is being temporarily added to a training room.
... View more
Created by
_Chris_
in Network Management
in Network Management
08-23-2018
01:25 PM
08-23-2018
01:25 PM
I need to install a 2960 switch in an area that is running out of ports. There is 1 available port to use and it is a Port Channel (Po1), it is using 2 interfaces in its bundle. I am familiar with adding switches to regular port but haven't added a switch to a port with Port Channel on it. Would it be the same? Just configure the access ports and trunk port and plug in? I've tried reading about this setup but keep running into "how to configure port channel" articles.
... View more
Labels:
02-12-2020
Hello, Still a new network guy here. Our organization is interested in
changing the current 192.x.x....
02-04-2020
I'm pretty sure I do. I just need to locate it. Once I do, then I could
enter NAT commands in THAT d...
02-04-2020
Thank you for the reply. A majority of this network is using 192.168.x.x
for their ip addresses. Wou...
02-04-2020
Hello, I believe this may have to do with editing my routing table... I
am still a newcomer to the C...
08-23-2018
This is not for a stack. The device is a 2960-CX. It's is being
temporarily added to a training room...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 08-16-2018 11:20 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 02-13-2020 09:59 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 19 |
Helpful Votes Given To
.jpg "VIP Advisor"){kind=icon}
