Is there a way to do Layer 3 Etherchannel reliably when connecting over a service provider? Any suggestions of protocols is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Here is my current setup. I have a shared number that is on 4 lines on the phones. Max number of calls is 6 and busy trigger is 1. Problem we are having is user related and want to see if there is a way to prevent it. When line 1 has a call on it...
Is there a way to only show missed calls for primary line on a phone and not for the shared line? We need this on a phone by phone basis, not system wide.
Giuseppe,Thanks again. Will LACP constantly be sending negotiation packets across the links? I think we are going to go with 2 seperate EIGRP links. Would UDLD also be an option?Mike
Giuseppe,Thanks for the reply. Does LACP actively monitor the link? Let me describe the situation. I have 2 switches connected with a 2 link Etherchannel. Each link is over a different service provider. We connect into service provider switches ...
Jon,I found this document. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t4/feature/guide/ftnatrt.html#wp1024922This is what I needed to do. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.Mike
Jon,That is what I am trying to do. It is not any source IP addresses, it is specific ones (from seperate networks) trying to get to the same FTP server. I just don't know the syntax on the 6500. I have only done it on ASA.Mike
Well, both. They both have to be NATed to an internal FTP server. So outside FTP 1 (X.X.X.X) and outside FTP 2 (Y.Y.Y.Y) both need to go to inside FTP address (Z.Z.Z.Z). So I see that there is a route-map available on the static nat commands. Was...