Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
To answer half of my own question I presume it's dropping the prefix as the nested apply is not matching and therefore without a pass we remove the route.
So aside from EEM/TCL any other options?
Xander, the add to Ron's question, if we vary what we want to do, in this case, match on an incoming VPNv4 prefixes RT.
Then if the RT match is true apply the local pref changes to another prefix.
What I was testing was something like this:
RP/0/0/CP...
You will get better load distribution over the links if you use the etherchannel, unless you have a very diverse set of IP source and destination addresses due the hashing used in the load-balancing calculations.As for PBR both the 3750 and the Cat6k...
This could be some rate-limiting of packets to the CPU, you can try and use the following command to see what's being dropped: show hardware rate-limitYou can read more about it in the following linkCisco Nexus 7000 Series NX-OS Troubleshooting Guide...
I don't see the same behavior as you, l have the same P1--P3 setup, here is the OSPF info:Router P1: Link connected to: another Router (point-to-point) (Link ID) Neighboring Router ID: 192.168.100.4 (Link Data) Router Interface address: 0....
