Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Question regarding uplinks in a stack of access switches: If we have let's say 4 access switches that are data stacked, can we just have uplinks be on the one switch and that will connect up the core/distribution layer? (Trying to save cost on netwo...
Hey all, Very beginner type question here...I don't understand the concept of total bandwidth of a switch. For instance an access switch with 48 Cooper ports is capable of "X" Gbps of bandwidth... How is this calculated and why is this important if ...
Hey there!Ever since the Cat 9000 series switches has come out the data sheets have been saying that Network Essentials is only Layer 2. But looking at a recent datasheet and comparing it to the features of IP Base in the 3850s, the features look to...
Hey all,
I'm a bit new to networking, but I have question that I've been wondering about...
If you are running EIGRP in your network (which seems MUCH simpler than OSPF), is there any reason to also configure OSPF on any interfaces if you are going s...
You don't need to run HSRP as Stackwise Virtual eliminates the need for it. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9000/nb-06-cat-9k-stack-wp-cte-en.html
Thank you so much for this answer. helps me a lot! So as a follow up, I'm looking at the screenshot attached for the bandwidth specifications of a Catalyst 9300 switches. The switching capacity for the CAT9300-24T shows 208 Gbps and the Switching ...
Hi Philip,
But from my calculations when listing out the subnet number's I get the following:
255.255.252.0 (256 - 252 = 4)
10.0.0.0.
10.0.4.0
10.0.8.0
What could I be missing?
Thank you!
