Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I just finished reading the Stackwise-480 Whitepaper . It's a very informative document, but it did not answer the question I have about my simple scenario. I currently do not have access to these switches, but I need to understand their expected be...
The WS-X45-Sup7-E features 4 x 10Gbps non-blocking switch ports when installed in the 4510R+E chassis. What happens to these ports during: a) a supervisor switchover and b) a supervisor software failure?
For instance, if there are WS-X45-Sup7-E ins...
We are doing switch testing in a network with C9548 and C9516 SWV-stacked switches (2 switches per stack). All switches are currently running 16.12.04. We notice a difference in behavior between the two models. On the 9548 stacks, when we console ...
I am trying to install licenses generated by the customer on a 2-switch 9516-A stack. The customer provided the tokens for each switch, and then I built the license file as shown below (serial numbers are redacted):
<smartLicense><specificPLR><aut...
I have 2 9516 switches in a SWV stack. "show switches" output shows that the switches are stacked and the active switch in the stack is as expected.
SW1#show file systemsFile Systems:
Size(b) Free(b) Type Flags Prefixes- - opaque rw system:- - opa...
I disconnect both Stackwise-480 cables (I'm assuming some kind of undesirable "split-brain" behavior)?--> you should connect connect switches like a ring, so even if you remove both cables from a single switch, there won't be a split brain situation
...
Thanks! If that's the case, then since the v1 community strings are shown as plaintext yes the RW string would be visible. That seems kinda broken, though.
