01-08-2010 12:15 PM - last edited on 03-25-2019 10:45 PM by ciscomoderator
What is the maximum number of concurrent VPN connections to the UC540 ? and the UC560 ?
We're looking to set up a site with remote agents and need to make sure they can all connect at the same time and answer calls.
Thank you,
Stacy
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-08-2010 12:36 PM
For the UC540, it is 10 connections.
For the UC560, it is 20 connections.
01-08-2010 12:36 PM
For the UC540, it is 10 connections.
For the UC560, it is 20 connections.
01-18-2010 03:25 PM
Perfect- thank you !
06-24-2010 05:38 AM
Hi Steven,
if i implement a UC560 in the HQ and i have a branche office with 20 users.
Is it possible to setup a site-to-site vpn with the UC560 and get all the 20 users/phones from the branche office registered at the UC560 without implementing a multi-site solution?
Another question. Let's say I would like to connect a branche office to the HQ (UC560 in the HQ).
what is the limit of users that can be in the branch office without using a multi-site solution.
Is it possible to somehow use a 870, 880 series router of cisco on both locations to take care of the site-to-site vpn. This way you don't have the limitations of the UC540/560?
Awaiting your answer.
06-24-2010 07:46 AM
Hi Smartingram
You said ;
Is it possible to setup a site-to-site vpn with the UC560 and get all the 20 users/phones from the branche office registered at the UC560 without implementing a multi-site solution?
According to table 5 below in the platform reference guide the number of users per teleworker site is limited to 5. Probably for a number of reasons that are not defined in that guide, but these limits were defined assuming that a appliance such as a SR520 or 88x was being used at the teleworker location.
See the following URL as an example;
Table 5. Feature Licensing for the Cisco UC 560
06-25-2010 02:27 AM
sorry, i was logged in with the wrong ID.
I understand the limitations of 20 teleworker sites and 5 users per teleworker site.
But i don't think the SR520 is in the same league as the CISCO880 series when it comes to throughput, etc.
I don't understand why a limitation is put in place when using a CISCO880 series at the teleworker site? The router can't handle let's say 10 simultaneous calls over WAN, through a site-to-site vpn connection to the HQ?
I could use a ASA5505 on both sides for vpn termination. This is still a much cheaper solution than implementing a second UC540W.
I would like some more info on what is possible, what is not possible and why?
PS. let's take into account that there's enough bandwidth for the site-to-site vpn connection
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide