06-26-2012 04:20 PM - edited 03-21-2019 05:58 AM
Hi Team,
Can you please comment on below questions.
1) Is there a restriction to the amount of SPA8800 supported on the CUCMBE3K ?
2) Is there any feature reduction with going with the SPA8800 over the VG224 apart from quantity of FXS ports? Will the faxes still be able to send faxes via the SPA8800 and be able to receive faxes (I see that CUCMBE3K support FAX pass-through, relay etc) ?
Thanks,
Henry
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-26-2012 08:25 PM
1) There is no hard limitation on number of SPA gateways that are supported on BE3K
2) SPA8800 also supports FXO ports also in addition to FXS ports. There is no reduction in feature. T.38 fax is supported on SPA 8800.
Sanjay
06-26-2012 08:25 PM
1) There is no hard limitation on number of SPA gateways that are supported on BE3K
2) SPA8800 also supports FXO ports also in addition to FXS ports. There is no reduction in feature. T.38 fax is supported on SPA 8800.
Sanjay
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide