01-19-2011 06:12 AM
Hi,
I have a problem with a reverse telnet connection.
I have a cisco 2600series and a 2900series switch and i would like to connect each other using this technic.
Actually i take a straight throug ethernet cable and i connect the aux port of 2600 router with the console port of 2900 switch.
I am using the following commands.
On 2600:
interface loopback 0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
no shut
line aux 0
transport input all
modem InOut
speed 19200
On 2900 switch i don't use any commad. Do i have to write something?
Of course after that i m using the command: telnet 10.1.1.1 2065
After that i m getting the following response:
trying 10.1.1.1:2065..... Open
with the cursor blinking.
It seems like the connection has established, but why i dont' receice a password prompt or something else?
I hit the CTRL-SHIFT-6-x and i m disconnecting from the switch. After that when i type the command: "show session" i see that i have an open connection with the switch. And of course i type the command "disc 1", in order to terminate the sessing.
Can you tell me what wrong am i doing?
Or if there is something missing in the configuration?
So silly implementation, but so difficult to connect.
Thanks
Elias
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-07-2011 05:38 AM
01-19-2011 06:38 AM
Hi,
pc------>2900(aux)---------------------------->2600(console)
connect 2900 and set commands below
line aux 0
privilege level 15
login local
modem InOut
transport input all
transport output all
interface loopback 0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
no shut
(for connect to 2600)
telnet 10.1.1.1 2001
hth
Muammer
01-20-2011 12:22 AM
Thanks for your reply.
The connection that i want to implement is 2600(aux)------->2900(console) and not the one that you have told me.
I believe that this is the correct order of connection or not?
01-20-2011 12:38 AM
I have written all these command on router 2600 and the result was that i m getting a prompt for username and password. I type the username and password that i have create on 2600 (i created also on the switch but it doesn't want it.) and i m getting the same cursor blinking message).
It's doesn't work this solution or something i am doing wrong.
Any ideas?
02-06-2011 10:23 PM
RJ45 to RJ45 async connection always need a roll-over cable (a RJ45 roll-over is not an ether X-over!):
Roll-Over:
1 - 8
2 - 7
3 - 6
4 - 5
5 - 4
6 - 3
7 - 2
8 - 1
this is because the console and aux on RJ45 have the exact same pin-out, eg. sending on 3, receiving on 6 (sorry can't remenber by heart, could also be the other way round)
so you need to cross-out rx and tx in the cable, which is done with a roll-over cable, you can tell easily on a flat cable if the "noses" of the RJ45 are on the same side of the flat cable (for cisco, roll over cables are typically light-blue and flat):
+-------+ +-------+
| |=======/ ... /===========| |
+-------+ +-------+
\___ ___/
or you can crimp your own cable like specified above
Rgds,
MiKa
02-07-2011 12:11 AM
I used a rollover cable and now it is working.
Thanks
02-07-2011 05:38 AM
Can you please mark you question as answered?
Rgds,
MiKa
02-07-2011 05:45 AM
How can i mark this thread as answered?
02-07-2011 05:54 AM
Glad to help
rgds
MiKa
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide