WAP321 and 4410N

[Piotr Kowalczyk]

Hi,

I just wonder if somebody can help me.

As I had problems with Cisco 4410N in bridge configuration, I was advised to use WAP321 instead.

My question is about coverage, I have never used WAP321 so not quite sure if has stronger or weaker signal in comparison to 4410N. Unfortunately I’m not able to find anything in documentation about this.

Other thing is your opinion about WAP321. Is it reliable and stable device? Any known issues (like in 4410N case)?

Could you advise please?

Thank you.

[Tom Watts · Accepted solution]

Piotr,

WAP321 ma troche silniejszy sygnal niz WAP4410n i pokrywa ponad 450m kwadratowych. Jesli chodzi o stabilnosc, to jak na razie jest bez zadnych problemow, a do tego oferuje dodatkowo bardziej zaawansowane opcje. Mozesz sie zapoznac z tym produktem i jego funkconalnoscia pod tym adresem: http://www.cisco.com/assets/sol/sb/wap321_sps/main.html

-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts

[Piotr Kowalczyk]

Tomasz, naprawde badzo dziekuje za pomoc.

Bede mial jeszcze jedno pytanie dotyczace WAP321 ale zadam je oddzielnie.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie.