11-16-2014 04:35 AM - edited 07-05-2021 01:56 AM
I have tried to search some documents, where I find Cisco saying 128 users can be supported. But I am confused is it? if, yes is it like all together 2.4/5.7 ghz or single radio !!!!
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-16-2014 06:04 AM
Don't look at the data sheets that specify the max devices, because that doesn't mean end user experience. Now there are various opinions in this. The rule of thumb has always been around 25 devices. If however you are doing voice and or video, this number would be less. If the end users are just doing web and email, you can bump this number up. Remember, the bottle mech would be the connection from the AP to the switch. Which is the main thing to look at. I'm school environments, I tend to see end users start complaining around when there is 33+ clients on a given access point in a high density implementation. Now can you have 40 or 50, sure, but it really comes down to when the end user starts noticing things and starts to complain. What you will hear is that it doesn't work here some times, but everywhere else, it's fine. If you look at the APs the devices was associated to and the history of number of clients on a given access point, you would be able to see a correlation between the two most of the time. Again, this is what I see.
Scott
11-16-2014 06:04 AM
Don't look at the data sheets that specify the max devices, because that doesn't mean end user experience. Now there are various opinions in this. The rule of thumb has always been around 25 devices. If however you are doing voice and or video, this number would be less. If the end users are just doing web and email, you can bump this number up. Remember, the bottle mech would be the connection from the AP to the switch. Which is the main thing to look at. I'm school environments, I tend to see end users start complaining around when there is 33+ clients on a given access point in a high density implementation. Now can you have 40 or 50, sure, but it really comes down to when the end user starts noticing things and starts to complain. What you will hear is that it doesn't work here some times, but everywhere else, it's fine. If you look at the APs the devices was associated to and the history of number of clients on a given access point, you would be able to see a correlation between the two most of the time. Again, this is what I see.
Scott
11-16-2014 02:45 PM
I have tried to search some documents, where I find Cisco saying 128 users can be supported.
Yes and no.
I agree with Scott.
NOTE #1: Bear in mind that the Cisco documentation, particularly Data Sheets, were authored by people who's sole job is to SELL products. So one has to take these documentation with a ton of salt.
NOTE #2: Right now (2245 GMT, 16 November 2014), I have an AP1140 with 139 authenticated users.
11-16-2014 05:18 PM
Hi,
First of all, it is always per radio. Also , 2600 supports 200 per radio , So Total 400 clients per AP.
This means it will allow you to to connect 199th client and then also 200th client but will give error when you try to connect 201th client, again per radio.
However , using controller , you can very well maximum number of clients allowed to connect to a particular radio. Why , well because of the reasons mentioned in the other post. Capacity of an AP cell depends upon number of RF factors and this setting should depend upon end user needs and RF analysis. It should be much below that Max value as per wireless best practices.
Regards
Dhiresh
**Please rate helpful posts**
11-17-2014 06:34 AM
Thank you so much to all of you here !!! for the valuable answer
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide