01-04-2015 09:38 AM - edited 07-05-2021 02:12 AM
Am I missing something, or is Meraki clearly the best choice and value in next-generation 802.11ac wireless? Meraki delivers control/data plane separation, wIPS, CMX, Locations Tracking, all the high end features (orderable under 2 skus, btw).
Cisco’s Converged Access solution paired with the Prime, MSE-CMX, MSE-wIPS, management overlay appears to achieve performance and feature parity with Meraki, but:
$12,490 for 10 Meraki MR32 Access Points with 5 years of service.
$85,000 for 10 Cisco 3702 Access Points with 5 years of service. Limited features (CMX does not actually work here). PLUS, an approx $7,500 of additional server installation services.
In other words, can you tell me why I would want to install a Cisco WLAN over a Meraki? The Maeraki delivers the most features and has the best patented protocol / architecture for separating control and data traffic. Or, no? ...Right?
- Ron Royston, CCIE #6824
01-11-2015 01:43 AM
Please help us understand why CA/CUA is preferred. I sincerely want and need to know. Any help is appreciated.
01-11-2015 07:05 AM
CA isn't stable! Feature parity between the two, CA is lacking many. We have had customer switch from CA to AireOS because of issues.
-Scott
01-11-2015 09:02 AM
I agree with Scoot. I wouldn't lead with CA in any of my large projects.
01-11-2015 02:36 PM
Scott, George, thanks for the heads up. It sounds like CA is bleeding edge. Good to know.
01-11-2015 02:32 PM
Please help us understand why CA/CUA is preferred. I sincerely want and need to know. Any help is appreciated.
In my view, most of people comfortable configuring & troubleshoot Unified Access (AireOS) & keep deploying it. That architecture meets requirements of client today & Cisco is keep tweaking it to add features & avoid any bandwidth limitation going future. This centralized architecture designed prior to 802.11n & WLC did not see as bottleneck of a network that time.
That point most vendors came up with distributed architecture is the way forward. Cisco also came up with CA as they did not want lag behind to other vendors. I agree with others that CA is not up to the standard with CUA as of today (but I hope Cisco will put effort to make CA is the way forward). I (may be the only one who deployed this CA in large scale campus environment) have deployed this CA in couple of campus buildings & going in that path to see how good this architecture & how well that integrate with CUA. Many others do not won't to be in that uncomfortable situation of managing a new architecture specially a product is a developing phase.
If it is a greenfield deployment you can consider any of these options (including Meraki), but most customers already have Cisco infrastructure, then CA or CUA can integrate (in the point of smooth roaming b/w these systems) that environment easily.
Hope this gives some idea why I prefer CA/CUA over Meraki.
Rasika
01-11-2015 02:44 PM
Does CA deliver superior roaming compared to Meraki? Converged Access required the IOS-based controller.
01-11-2015 03:04 PM
I do not think you can make roaming work between Meraki system & CUA or CA systems. But CA system works well with CUA
HTH
Rasika
01-11-2015 03:21 PM
Do you know if one system offers desired roaming features or functionality not found in the other system?
01-11-2015 03:36 PM
What you need to look at is what do you really require for a wireless system. There are pros and cons to every system, but knowing what works and doesn't work on a firmware level helps. Meraki, you don't have a choice as they will eventually push out a firmware. This is good and bad, but unlike any other vendor that lets you choose, you have consistency and Meraki support if something does break. Roaming works fine, but again, all depends on the client devices, the access point vendor system and code versions and the placement of access points. Having peers providing input of issues and what works and doesn't along with customer who like or dislike things, helps with choosing a recommended technology. I have AireOS, CA, Meraki all in my home lab, but I will use AireOS for stability, then Meraki and then CA. As much as I want to just use CA, I can't stand the issues I run into just at home, so why would I want to deploy it. I test bonjour and Chromecast along with mesh and roaming. Deployments I have done and my peers help decide what really works where. I work with the product team for AireOS, CA and Meraki and I like them all, but I want what works well for my customer.
-Scott
01-11-2015 03:55 PM
The requirement a next-generation 802.11ac wireless and CA is required for apples to apples comparison to Meraki 802.11ac MR32 AP, right?. Without CA, Meraki wins bcs more features, faster, easier, better price, no?
How do you figure AireOS is more reliable? I understand that the customer's Meraki WLAN continues working at 100% capacity when disconnected from Internet.
01-11-2015 06:16 PM
It's all about how you design it and overalls stability. You can go with any product as long as you know it will and can meet your requirements. I say go for what you think will work for you stick with it. Stability is more than what happens if your internet goes down.
-Scott
01-11-2015 03:31 PM
Rasika, actually that is not correct.
If it is a greenfield deployment you can consider any of these options (including Meraki), but most customers already have Cisco infrastructure, then CA or CUA can integrate (in the point of smooth roaming b/w these systems) that environment easily.
CA requires a rip& replace of existing wired LAN (must use specific Cisco switches). Next-generation (802.11ac) AP's from any vendor require PoE+ which is not yet widely deployed. So, customers will likely be doing a WiFi upgrade concurrent with a wired-LAN upgrade.
01-10-2015 03:36 PM
AireOS, as in Airespace aquired by Cisco in '05, is based on a dead-end centralized controller based architecture, right? Meraki, acquired by Cisco in '12, delivers the richest features and functionality in a scalable manner. I really don't know the details of their architecture. I understand that it is patented.
This is a useless topic. Cisco bought out Meraki because this product will form part of a marketing niche. Cisco Aerospace product has a particular (high-end) niche. It's all to do with a spot in the ladder. Cisco will never allow Meraki products to be "at par" with Aerospace. Never. Think of it this way: Toyota and Lexus. Do you see Toyota have Lexus grade technology? Upholstery? Drive? Suspension? Engine? Differential? No. Lexus maybe owned by Toyota but each one fills a spot in the ladder.
If you know what you're doing and you have the budget to show, then a number of companies prefer Aerospace. If you have "doubts" about what benefits wifi can do (a lot of CIO still do) and/or don't have budget then Meraki can fit the budget.
Marketing documentation needs to be taken with a ton of salt. I don't care how many APs can Meraki cloud says the platform can support but unless you've got one set up that mimic a full blown enterprise environment, those document are as good as toilet paper to me.
Scott Fella's response is spot-on. It's all about reputation. It's all about how you want to deploy and how much can you afford. Cisco has been in the wireless market as early as 2001. Cisco wireless product, alone, is priced very expensive because of a reason.
Can anyone provide some specific reason why they would purchase Cisco Converged Access vs Meraki?
01-11-2015 01:40 AM
Leo, thanks for participating in the discussion. My question/post is not useless and terms like Cadillac, Lexus, and Toyota are not helping much.
I think Scott is in agreements with me that Meraki is unconditionally better. If you disagree please state why:
1. First valid point goes here. (Be specific, e.g., forwarding rate, feature, cost savings, anything?)
2. Second valid point goes here.
3. etc.
01-11-2015 07:03 AM
I didn't say Meraki is better:) Cisco acquired them to compete with the other cloud type vendors, especially Aruba. Between AireOS, CA and Meraki, we implement mostly AireOS, Meraki then CA.
-Scott
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide