09-13-2013 02:03 PM - edited 07-04-2021 12:50 AM
Is there any reason why we'd need to use a controller to provide guest wireless from a 1602? We currently have 1142 and had 1130's before and neither required a controller for guest access. I've setup a few other model Cisco wireless access points and this is the first I'm hearing that a controller would be required for this functionality. Nothing fancy required w/ respect to the guest network (accepting agreement, using guest username/passwords, etc), just broadcasting a separate SSID for visitors and hanging that traffic off an interface on the firewall and blocking access internally. I'd imagine a controller would be overkill for 3 - 4 access points.
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-13-2013 02:12 PM
No a controller is not necessar for what you are looking to do.
HTH,
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered
09-13-2013 02:12 PM
No a controller is not necessar for what you are looking to do.
HTH,
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to rate useful posts, and mark questions as answered
09-13-2013 02:16 PM
Thanks. That's what I thought based on past experience. Guess the sales team got a little ahead of themselves when they were making recommendations.
09-14-2013 10:34 AM
Just make sure you buy AP that start with AIR-SAP1602. SAP is the new prefix for Standalone where CAP is for controller based.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide