cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
496
Views
3
Helpful
18
Replies

Unexpected channel shifts from configured channels in Cisco APs

roshney-roy
Level 1
Level 1

Hi Experts,

We are using a licensed Cisco Catalyst 9800-CL Wireless Controller to manage our Cisco APs (models C9124AXE and AIR-AP1526E-Z-K9). According to our wireless network requirements, the channels on the APs are manually configured for both the bands(2.4 & 5 Ghz)

However, we are experiencing an issue where the AP channels are changing automatically despite the manual configuration. This is particularly noticeable with the 2.4 GHz channels, which tend to shift significantly.

We would appreciate any insights or suggestions on how to resolve this issue.

Thank you!

Regards,

Roshney Roy

 

18 Replies 18

I suggest you go back to TAC in that case @roshney-roy 

CSCwj08558 is tagged as Unreproducible which means TAC were not able to reproduce it in their lab and the software development is not working on a fix for it.  Telling you to upgrade to 17.15.1 sounds like a wild shot in the dark hoping that that will fix it and I very much doubt that it will.  Also that bug only mentions 2.4GHz channels - nothing about 5 GHz channels.

I'll repeat Scott's question which you did not actually answer: Why do you need static channel allocations?

Hi Rich R,

TAC updated the case today with a response that they do not have a fix at the moment(though the firmware upgrade was given as a solution few days ago). Developers are working to find a fix for the issue.

I had replied to Scott "Yes, it is a requirement at the access end of 2.4ghz to make the channel static. "

Hope to find a fix soon!!

I had replied to Scott "Yes, it is a requirement at the access end of 2.4ghz to make the channel static. "

That does not say why you have that requirement - just repeats that you have it.


@roshney-roy wrote:
Cisco TAC has identified the bug "CSCwj08558" and has recommeded a firmware upgrade (17.15.1)

Go back to Cisco TAC and get this case escalated to the BU &/or developers.  "upgrade to 17.X.X" is not an acceptable solution/workaround. 

Demand for an SMU or an APSP.  

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card