08-23-2017 09:37 AM - edited 03-01-2019 03:18 PM
We are trying to understand the difference between these 36-port and 24-ports cards.
Is the 36-port card considered to be oversubscribed as compared to the 24-port card?
Is is RSP dependent?
Any other details would be helpful.
Thank you.
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-23-2017 12:07 PM
The fabric on the ASR9K (on the RSPs) runs in active/active, so both RSPs fabric are used at the same time.
The 24x10 card offers more NPs but fewer ports per NP, it is undersubscribed with 3 ports per NP, whereas the 36x10 card uses all the BW of the NP to support 6 ports per NP. So in terms of performance both cards should be able to handle linerate.
Thanks,
Sam
08-23-2017 11:37 AM
Neither card is oversubscribed, the only difference is the number of NPs and ports.
You can check the NP mapping with show controller np ports all loc <lc>.
With dual RSP440 you have 440Gbps/slot.
Thanks,
Sam
08-23-2017 11:54 AM
Sam,
In an ASR-9010 chassis, when DUAL RSP440's are used, one of them is considered "standby".
So even with one RSP440 set as "satndby", the 2 RSP's provide 440G per slot?
If a system is running DUAL RSP440's, does the 36X10G card offer the same performance as the 24X10G card? Do all 36 ports have the same performance?
08-23-2017 12:07 PM
The fabric on the ASR9K (on the RSPs) runs in active/active, so both RSPs fabric are used at the same time.
The 24x10 card offers more NPs but fewer ports per NP, it is undersubscribed with 3 ports per NP, whereas the 36x10 card uses all the BW of the NP to support 6 ports per NP. So in terms of performance both cards should be able to handle linerate.
Thanks,
Sam
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide