12-05-2016 06:59 AM
Both 9Ks are on 5.3.4. I have a single NV SAT that sits between the two 9K's
Is this the expected behavior of Router 9001_B to be in Cold Standby? Thanks
****************************************** 9001 A config ******************************************
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9001_A#show bundle brief
Mon Dec 5 08:44:10.619 cst
Name | IG | State | LACP | BFD | Links | Local b/w, |
| | | | | act/stby/cfgd | kbps |
-------|----------|---------------|------|-----|---------------|------------|
BE3 - Up Off Off 2 / 0 / 2 2000000
BE4 - Up Off Off 2 / 0 / 2 2000000
BE5 - Up Off Off 2 / 0 / 2 2000000
- Up Off Off 2 / 0 / 2 2000000
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9001_A#sh run redundancy iccp group 1
Mon Dec 5 08:48:08.266 cst
redundancy
iccp
group 1
member
neighbor 10.43.95.105
!
nv satellite
system-mac 0100.4309.5105
!
!
interface TenGigE0/0/0/2
mtu 9212
vrf NV_MGMT
ipv4 point-to-point
ipv4 unnumbered Loopback100
nv
satellite-fabric-link network
redundancy
iccp-group 1
!
satellite 300
remote-ports GigabitEthernet 0/0/0-43
!
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9001_A#show bundle bundle-ether 3
Mon Dec 5 08:58:25.122 cst
Bundle-Ether3
Status: Up
Local links <active/standby/configured>: 2 / 0 / 2
Local bandwidth <effective/available>: 2000000 (2000000) kbps
MAC address (source): 8478.ac7f.71f3 (Chassis pool)
Inter-chassis link: No
Minimum active links / bandwidth: 1 / 1 kbps
Maximum active links: 4
Wait while timer: 1000 ms
Load balancing: Default
LACP: Not operational
Flap suppression timer: Off
Cisco extensions: Disabled
Non-revertive: Disabled
mLACP: Not configured
IPv4 BFD: Not configured
Port Device State Port ID B/W, kbps
-------------------- --------------- ----------- -------------- ----------
Gi300/0/0/0 Local Active 0x8000, 0x0000 1000000
Link is Active
Gi300/0/0/22 Local Active 0x8000, 0x0000 1000000
Link is Active
!
!
****************************************** 9001 B config ******************************************
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9001_B#show bundle brief
Mon Dec 5 08:45:18.258 cst
Name | IG | State | LACP | BFD | Links | Local b/w, |
| | | | | act/stby/cfgd | kbps |
-------|----------|---------------|------|-----|---------------|------------|
BE3 - Cold standby Off Off 0 / 0 / 2 0
BE4 - Cold standby Off Off 0 / 0 / 2 0
BE5 - Cold standby Off Off 0 / 0 / 2 0
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9001_B#sh run redundancy iccp group 1
Mon Dec 5 08:49:54.257 cst
redundancy
iccp
group 1
member
neighbor 10.43.95.113
!
nv satellite
system-mac 0100.4309.5105
!
!
interface TenGigE0/0/0/2
mtu 9212
vrf NV_MGMT
ipv4 point-to-point
ipv4 unnumbered Loopback100
nv
satellite-fabric-link network
redundancy
iccp-group 1
!
satellite 300
remote-ports GigabitEthernet 0/0/0-43
!
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9001_B#show bundle bundle-ether 3
Mon Dec 5 08:59:07.104 cst
Bundle-Ether3
Status: Cold standby
Local links <active/standby/configured>: 0 / 0 / 2
Local bandwidth <effective/available>: 0 (0) kbps
MAC address (source): d867.d961.83da (Chassis pool)
Inter-chassis link: No
Minimum active links / bandwidth: 1 / 1 kbps
Maximum active links: 4
Wait while timer: 1000 ms
Load balancing: Default
LACP: Not operational
Flap suppression timer: Off
Cisco extensions: Disabled
Non-revertive: Disabled
mLACP: Not configured
IPv4 BFD: Not configured
Port Device State Port ID B/W, kbps
-------------------- --------------- ----------- -------------- ----------
Gi300/0/0/0 Local Configured 0x8000, 0x0000 1000000
Link is in standby redundancy state
Gi300/0/0/22 Local Configured 0x8000, 0x0000 1000000
Link is in standby redundancy state
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-06-2016 05:51 AM
could it be that there is a configuration mismatch between the active and standby POA for this bundle?
here are a few reasons for a bundle to be in cold standby:
The bundle interface will be Down on the Standby device if: 1. The device is not ready to forward bundle traffic; if the bundle goes down on the Active device, traffic will be lost. 2. The device is cold standby for the bundle [ie]: The bundle has enough links available to take over if required. However, it is marked as Down in IM because it will have to be Down initially after the switchover while LACP negotiations are in progress. This is due to some missing configuration that is required for a seamless switchover; e.g. lacp switchover suppress-flaps.
xander
12-06-2016 05:51 AM
could it be that there is a configuration mismatch between the active and standby POA for this bundle?
here are a few reasons for a bundle to be in cold standby:
The bundle interface will be Down on the Standby device if: 1. The device is not ready to forward bundle traffic; if the bundle goes down on the Active device, traffic will be lost. 2. The device is cold standby for the bundle [ie]: The bundle has enough links available to take over if required. However, it is marked as Down in IM because it will have to be Down initially after the switchover while LACP negotiations are in progress. This is due to some missing configuration that is required for a seamless switchover; e.g. lacp switchover suppress-flaps.
xander
12-12-2016 07:29 AM
Thanks for the explanation Xander. To note - the failover does work when the cold standby sides does go active. It would appear if we implement "switchover suppress flaps" we'd still be looking at some downtime when the active link is restored and it fails back?
12-12-2016 09:48 AM
it should go very fast, but it is partially dependent on the DHD also.
the suppress flaps will allow us to keep the bundle up while the lacp negotiations are happening for a short period of time, as long as its timer value configured.
the down event can have a ripple effect obviously in terms of routing and other events that are happening when an interface goes from up to down to up again.
cheers!
xander
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide