12-16-2015 10:38 AM
Hi Cisco Experts.
Is there a limitation in using IRB and BVI in PE-to-CE eBGP peering?
Interface facing CE is configured as:
- L2transport
- dot1q encapsulation
- VRF
- IPv4 address in BVI
- l2vpn configuration for PE to CE interface and BVI
- eBGP with CE
My experience is PE receives/advertises all routes. But user plane is not working. No data is being forwarded.
XR version is 5.2.0
Please advise. thanks.
12-16-2015 11:09 AM
Hi Ar,
make sure you have "per-VRF label allocation" enabled under the vrf under bgp since its the only supported config.
Thanks
Swapnil
12-16-2015 08:53 PM
Hi Swapnil.
Thanks.
Do you have good documentation for this?
Is this a known issue in IRB PE-to-CE and will be resolved 100% with this command?
ARe routes coming from PE-to-CE using physical interface will now be also per-vrf label allocation? or will not be affected and will still be per-prefix?
12-17-2015 01:30 AM
Hi, this is per design. Well documented here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-1/interfaces/configuration/guide/hc41asr9kbook/hc41irb.html#wp1014268
Regards
Eddie.
12-17-2015 01:56 AM
Thanks.
Is this required to be configured on all PEs?
Or it's safe to just apply on involved PE?
12-17-2015 07:50 AM
Hi Ar,
yes on all PEs ,read more below
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11332686/forwarding-does-not-work-if-label-allocation-mode-vrf-not-set-using-bvi
hth,
swapnil
12-17-2015 09:02 AM
Hi Swapnil.
Can I touch just the PE router having BVI vrf aware facing CE?
Or is it design wise recommended to configure on all PEs?
I am also thinking of placing a route-policy such as below to affect only routes coming from particulary CE.
router bgp <>
vrf TEST
address-family ipv4
label mode route-policy VRF-TEST per-vrf
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide