Cisco Bug Discussions

I have a C930048P-E and it boots into a switch: prompt. I cannot force it into ROMMON nor can I tftp the following IOS file to the switch. switch: setBOARDID=20564IP_ADDRESS=192.168.0.1MAC_ADDR=84:8A:8D:E0:5C:80MODEL_NUM=C9300-48PMOTHERBOARD_SERIAL_N...

 Unfortunately, the problem persists in version 15.2(7)E7. IGMP Query packets (224.0.0.1) sent from the router do not reach all hosts, resulting in loss of multicast traffic to selected hosts. Only disabling the igmp snooping helps.

Also observed with 17.6.3 Primarily affected VRRP (approx. every 2 hours). UDLD affected once a day around the same time. VRRP master stops sending VRRP advertisements (no packet captured by optical tap and no advertisement sent as per the debugging ...

Hello, I'm experiencing a switch WS-C3650-24T reload with the last reason of "Power Failure" but there was no actual power issue. 3650#show versionCisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst L3 Switch Software (CAT3K_CAA-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 03....

This bug shows it was fixed via a firmware update, but the new firmware is not listed or available.  Can you please provide a link to download the new 3.2.x firmware?

hello we have alos an issue on C9500 configured in stack wise virtual with this QoS  commandor C9500 version is younger xxx-RSW-CORE01#sh verCisco IOS XE Software, Version 16.12.03abut result isNO problem of split or crash for the membersbut NOT any ...

is the problem already fixed?

This is causing false positives for our network monitoring.  Is there any updates to fix this issue? 

Hi Team,   How i can fix this vulnerability from 

On 16.12.3a with cat 3850's and seeing a similar error, but with a code 2 instead of code 1. Wondering if others are seeing this?  The only policer is that which is setup when issuing auto qos voip cisco-phone. The ports in question do not have cisco...

Firmware: 2.5.8.15%SYSLOG-F-OSFATAL: caught segmentation fault exception at address 0xaa7ff784 signal-num = 11 (SIGSEGV) signal-code = 2 (SEGV_ACCERR) reg[00] = 0x0 reg[01] = 0xaa7fc356 reg[02] = 0x0 reg[03] = 0x2e reg[04] = 0x342e reg[05] = 0xaa7fc3...

I found the problem in version 16.12.4 but the webpage asks for a workaround. https://bst.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvt22237

This is total crap. Hitting the same bug as CSCvj25368. What's the issue, Cisco folks? ...have a really simple, straightforward policy map configured: policy-map detangle-queuesclass v4-lsb-0set dscp defaultclass v4-lsb-1set dscp 1class v4-lsb-2set d...