10-20-2016 06:46 AM - edited 03-01-2019 04:32 AM
Hello, I have read a thread that Adam R commented in last week that 1.3 would be released today, is today going to be the day?
John Palmason
Solved! Go to Solution.
10-26-2016 12:30 PM
Will EasyQoS app run with 32GB available to the cluster?
Another way to ask - will base apps and EasyQoS run with two nodes or just base apps?
10-26-2016 01:08 PM
32g node is full function. Limited to 500 devices.
All applications
Sent from my iPhone
10-26-2016 04:34 PM
Hmm.. Upgraded and can't login.
10-26-2016 04:41 PM
What was the base release you upgraded from - 1.2.0.1594 or 1.2.1.691?
Do you get a generic login failure or any specific message?
10-26-2016 04:42 PM
Please clear the browser cache after the upgrade then login back.
10-26-2016 05:16 PM
1.2.1.691
is_alive: false is currently false for the host. I don't mean to hijack the thread. I'll keep troubleshooting and if it doesn't come back up after some basic fixing I'll start another thread.
10-26-2016 12:54 PM
I see in the "General Limitations" Section that PfR is not supported with DMVPN tunnels in this release....If i am reading this correctly, does this state that in release 1.3, we cannot use/deploy IWAN and utilize PfR at the same time, since the IWAN transport is over DMVPN?
10-26-2016 02:22 PM
Hi Brian,
I worked out where the confusion is.
IWAN App does support PfR and DMVPN. No question about this, I have been testing this for the past month. There are quite a few enhancements to the resiliency and loging of the deployment process.
Path Trace will support DMVPN, but not PfR yet. What this means is that Path Trace will show you the DMVPN tunnel, but does not (yet) look at the PfR information to see which path an application is using.
Adam
10-26-2016 02:37 PM
Yeah I think that needs clarified in the release notes if it's specific to the path trace app
10-26-2016 02:40 PM
I will get that fixed.
Thanks for the feedback.
10-26-2016 01:43 PM
One other question regarding topology and deployment. Does the APIC-EM collect the AVC and NBAR data used to calculate decisions for PfR? Or does an APIC-EM deployment with PfR, AVC, NBAR, etc require a net flow collector like Prime or Live Action to make PfR decisions? I can't seem to find the right answer. Thanks!!
10-26-2016 02:20 PM
Hi Brian,
APIC does not actually collect the AVC data. It does two things:
1) It configures the data export to a collector of your choice.
2) It has API integration into Prime Infrastructure (if you are using that as a collector) to show the data.
If you are using Prime Infra then you will get visibility in the IWAN App.
10-26-2016 02:42 PM
Adam,
Thanks for the reply. I appreciate the response. So, my follow on question is: Is a netflow collector required for PfR to work? Customer currently has solarwinds as its netflow collector, collector license for Prime is List 20k.
10-26-2016 02:50 PM
Hi Brian,
a net flow collector is not required for PfR to work.
Net flow gives you visibility into how the applications are performing. It is really exporting the information that PfR has and uses to makes intelligent decisions.
As long as your collector supports the right flow templates, you can use any collector. I know we have tested PI + LiveAction.
In the IWAN App, you are able to enter the IP address of your collector and it will be added to the configuration to ensure the export.
The value of PI is the API integration to show the information natively in IWAN app. You get apps and QoS graphs like you see below.
Adam
10-26-2016 02:52 PM
Perfect. Thanks for the clarification!!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide