08-13-2013 12:39 AM - edited 03-16-2019 06:49 PM
Googd morning everybody.
I have a CSS to allow call mobile numbers in Spain which contains a partition.
I set this CSS and this partition in my phone (6921).
Mobile phones in Spain use this pattern. [67]XXXXXXXX (nine digits)
I have a routte patter created with the following format:
0.[67]8XXXXXXX
Pratition that I mentioned before.
Discar digits: Predot
I configured the 8 in the route pattern to do test in my mobile (686XXXXXX).
I know my ISP allows block caller id because if I configure Calling Line ID Presentation to Restricted in the GW MGCP and all Cisco phones of the company have blocked calling line id but I only want block this in 7 dial numbers, Cisco 6921.
Something in wrong because when I call my mobile from my phone, calling number of my ISDN id number is shown.
I use CUCM 8.5
Thanks in advance.
08-13-2013 04:06 AM
Can you provide the Dialed Number Analysis accessible through serviceability. Make sure you select the Calling Search Space when doing the analysis.
Might need to start the service. This will at least give us a clue on what is going on to make sure you are hitting the route pattern you expect.
08-13-2013 05:05 AM
I guess this call to a mobile numer of Spain 0.[67]XXXXXXX is matching with the correct route pattern:
6XXXXXXXX (I typed X to don't show my mobile number here)
6XXXXXXXX (I typed X to don't show my mobile number here)
09-11-2013 07:17 AM
Hi,
I guess that you already have sorted this out, but if not this is my 2 cents.
It looks as the problem might be that you do digit manipulations on both RP and RL level, the later will override the former. You have a DDI of predot on both RP and RL for the called number, if not put there intentionally (there are reasons for when you'd want to do that, but let's leave that out for now) then remove the DDI on the RL.
From the RP
Called Party Transformations
From the RL
Called Party Transformations
On the RP you also have a prefix of something, unknown since you masked it out in your post. Do you need to have a prefix, since that seems to match the original dialed number, exluding the leding zero for the outside line.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.
09-25-2013 01:20 AM
I found the problem.
In the E1 interface of the GW
Call Routing Information - Outbound Calls
All it's ok now.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide