02-17-2014 10:26 AM - edited 03-16-2019 09:47 PM
I have a new Sales department and they want to be able to call 6 different areas, in which we have a local presence, and have a local number show up for Caller ID and return calls. I have setup a separate Partition and CSS for these users, which will send calls out our SIP trunk. I need all other calls to show the External Phone Number Mask, as normal
I have tried using the Calling Party Transformation in the route pattern to achieve this. I've added it to the Sales partition. I also tried using translation patterns. The "
Use Calling Party's External Phone Number Mask" box is unchecked in both scenarios. I need to get this completed before I brief them on it tomorrow. The External Phone Number Mask field is empty on my test extension. The far end sees the extension of that phone, and not the intended local number.
Any help?
Thanks in advance
- Jonathan Beardsley
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-17-2014 11:34 AM
You're on the right track, use a separate RP for those users,and that area code, and change the calling party number there.
Make sure the RG/RL does not overwrite this with something else.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
02-17-2014 11:46 AM
Partition order is only used as a tie breaker when equally good matches are found, is that the case???
If not, then yes, best match will be used, no matter what.
If your new RP is not the best match, then you'll need to adjust it.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
02-17-2014 11:34 AM
You're on the right track, use a separate RP for those users,and that area code, and change the calling party number there.
Make sure the RG/RL does not overwrite this with something else.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
02-17-2014 11:43 AM
In the CSS, there are other RP's that include less specific Long Distance Routes. Won't the more specific routes win first, especially if the sales partition is listed first in the CSS?
I am using a "Sales" Route Partition for the specific Route Patterns for Sales.
- Jonathan Beardsley
02-17-2014 11:46 AM
Partition order is only used as a tie breaker when equally good matches are found, is that the case???
If not, then yes, best match will be used, no matter what.
If your new RP is not the best match, then you'll need to adjust it.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk
02-17-2014 11:54 AM
No, the Route Pattern should be more specific than any other pattern in the entire system, much less the CSS.
Thanks.
- Jonathan Beardsley
02-17-2014 11:46 AM
Ah, I didn't set the line for the route partition. This will require some more thought, but should just be able to add the new route partition to the standard calling search spaces, so that the extensions can still be reached normally.
- Jonathan Beardsley
02-17-2014 01:09 PM
The problem, for me, was that the "Use External Phone Number Mask" box was checked on teh Route Group, overriding other changes.
So, I built separate RG, RL, and Route Patterns to achieve my goals, applying the Calling Party Transformation on the Route Pattern, thus applying different CallerID per area code of called party.
Thanks!
- Jonathan Beardsley
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide