06-29-2010 02:31 AM - edited 03-15-2019 11:27 PM
Hello,
I'm plagning to migrate a Callmanager Cluster from 4.2 version to 7.1next week, but my customer tried to patch the 4.2 version and the patch failed in the subscriber (Now the servers system version in the Publisher is 4.2(3)SR2 and in the subscriber is 4.2(3)SR1/ the Installation ID in the Publisher is CCM4.2(3)SR2 and in the subscriber is 4.2(3)).
Can I execute the DMA in Publisher in this state or i must synchronize the both servers before ?
Regards,
Mohamed
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-29-2010 05:39 AM
Hi Mohamed,
If it were me I would want everything working properly on the Cluster before
running the DMA The upgrade of the current Sub to 4.2(3)SR2 wouldn't
take too long and would buy you some peace of mind. I'm guessing that
for TAC support this would be a requirement as well.
Just my thoughts my friend,
Cheers!
Rob
06-29-2010 11:13 AM
Hi Mohamed,
Good stuff
Again...this is just my opinion, but I would stick with 7.1(3b)SU2. The latest
Patch for 7.1(5) has only been out 12 days and it's predecessor only lasted
3 days before being replaced. I'm sure the VG248 will be fine with 7.1(5) if you
chose to go that route.
Cheers!
Rob
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp43011
06-29-2010 05:39 AM
Hi Mohamed,
If it were me I would want everything working properly on the Cluster before
running the DMA The upgrade of the current Sub to 4.2(3)SR2 wouldn't
take too long and would buy you some peace of mind. I'm guessing that
for TAC support this would be a requirement as well.
Just my thoughts my friend,
Cheers!
Rob
06-29-2010 09:03 AM
Hi Rob,
Thank you very much for your advise. I agree totaly.
Do you advise me please to upgrade to 7.1(5)SU1a or 7.1(3b)SU2 ?
I find that the VG248 version 1.3(2) is compatible with 7.1(3) but i don't find if it's compatible with 7.1(5) ?
Regards,
Mohamed
06-29-2010 11:13 AM
Hi Mohamed,
Good stuff
Again...this is just my opinion, but I would stick with 7.1(3b)SU2. The latest
Patch for 7.1(5) has only been out 12 days and it's predecessor only lasted
3 days before being replaced. I'm sure the VG248 will be fine with 7.1(5) if you
chose to go that route.
Cheers!
Rob
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr.html#wp43011
06-30-2010 05:10 AM
Ok thank you very much again Rob
Regrards,
Mohamed
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide