04-16-2019 07:48 AM
Looking for assistance with our PRIs connected to Cisco ISR 4431, Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 16.04.01.
We are connecting via PRI to local vendor for local/incoming and outgoing (2 way) service.
Calls are working correctly but every so often (which makes this harder to catch) we will receive a "fast busy/all trunks busy" indication. When I debug the calls, looks like channel is not available. Seems as if the calls are giving false status indication.
Or not totally releasing from previous call. If I bump the port via cli in the router, it will clear up and return to normal service...until the next time. Our other circuits attached to Cisco 2951 (older) do NOT seem to have these issues...ever!
I suspect there is a bug. Has anyone had these issues? I'd like to research this issue for a fix action. DSP allocation is fine.
Thanks in advance. Maybe just tell me where to look for guide that provide line break down so I can decipher the errors being shown.
see example:
121406173: Apr 15 16:03:07.209: ISDN Se0/2/3:23 Q931: SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0DFC
Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
Standard = CCITT
Transfer Capability = Speech
Transfer Mode = Circuit
Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
Channel ID i = 0xA98397
Exclusive, Channel 23
Facility i = 0x9F8B0100A10F02017006072A8648CE1500040A0100
Protocol Profile = Networking Extensions
0xA10F02017006072A8648CE1500040A0100
Component = Invoke component
Invoke Id = 112
Operation = InformationFollowing (calling_name)
Name information in subsequent FACILITY message
Progress Ind i = 0x8281 - Call not end-to-end ISDN, may have in-band info
Calling Party Number i = 0x2183, '512XXXXXXX'
Plan:ISDN, Type:National
Called Party Number i = 0xC1, '56XXXXX'
Plan:ISDN, Type:Subscriber(local)
121406174: Apr 15 16:03:07.209:
cmbrl_send_pak: --> Sending backhauled msg for Se0/2/3:23 :
| bk_msg_type = DATA_IND
| bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:3
| Q.931 length = 66
| Q.931 message type: SETUP
| Q.931 message = 08020DFC0504038090A21803A983971C159F8B0100A10F02017006072A8648CE1500040A01001E0282816C0C2183353132353339383530307008C135363530313032
121406175: Apr 15 16:03:07.211: ISDN Se0/2/3:23 Q921: User TX -> RR sapi=0 tei=0 nr=10
121406176: Apr 15 16:03:07.212:
cmbh_rcv_callback: <-- Receiving backhaul msg for Se0/2/3:23 :
| bk_msg_type = DATA_REQ
| bk_chan_id (slot:port) = 0:3
| Q.931 length = 9
| Q.931 message type: RELEASE COMPLETE
| Q.931 message = 08028DFC5A080280AC
121406177: Apr 15 16:03:07.212: ISDN Se0/2/3:23 Q921: User TX -> INFO sapi=0 tei=0, ns=67 nr=10
121406178: Apr 15 16:03:07.212: ISDN Se0/2/3:23 Q931: RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8DFC
Cause i = 0x80AC - Requested circuit/channel not available
NUMBER BLOCKED FOR PRIVACY. XXXXXXX
04-17-2019 02:21 AM
04-17-2019 05:59 AM
Thanks, that is a good point. I thought that as well but some of the PRIs are connected to a different switch all together and they are also having calls when initiating calls. Strange issue because the same circuit will pass traffic and then fail the next time. I suspect there might be a bug in the 4431. Appreciate the input! Oh, I think I mentioned that same setup on diggerent gateway, 2951, NEVER fails and all circuits are created the same. The plot thickens. :)
04-17-2019 07:21 AM
Hi,
not sure but there is a bug related to memory leaks for ISDN
04-17-2019 08:07 AM
04-17-2019 10:09 AM
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide