06-17-2015 11:54 AM - edited 03-17-2019 03:23 AM
Hi, has anybody implemented HSRP with a CUBE pair?
CUBE 1 is .1 and CUBE 2 is .2, HSRP is .3
Calls ingress from the ITSP to the public IP, natted to .3 but the CUBE tries to reply with .1 instead of the HSRP address.
Is it possible to implement HSRP in this manner?
Thanks
Sean
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-17-2015 08:49 PM
Hi Sean,
Here is a document you can refer to, please let us know if you have any further queries
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-border-element/112095-cube-hsrp-config-00.html
HTH
06-17-2015 05:39 PM
There's a doc on CUBE redundancy with HSRP on cisco.com, have you reviewed it???
06-17-2015 08:49 PM
Hi Sean,
Here is a document you can refer to, please let us know if you have any further queries
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-border-element/112095-cube-hsrp-config-00.html
HTH
06-24-2015 09:28 AM
Hi guys, thanks for your responses. I had reviewed the doc and configured the CUBEs as per the doc, but it seems that HSRP CUBE just wouldn't work in our specific scenario due to the infrastructure in place. We raised a service request and had Cisco review the configuration, and they have advised us not to use it in our case.
06-24-2015 10:06 AM
Thanks for the update.
Glad I was able to help.
Regards
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide